My fortran packages are non-free (pgplot5) or contrib (ifeffit). I have
not yet had any time to determine if these are going to cause problems. I
am sort of worried though because pgplot5 is quite particular.
Carlo
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
The proposal to transition f
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 11:40:10PM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote:
>
> Coin,
>
> Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes a rebuild is needed to link the package against the new
> > libode0debian1.
>
> Is there a minimum number of packages involved to ask the release team
> for an aut
Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
>
I am not a maintainer of any of the affected packa
Hi Riku,
On 7/21/07, Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
If you have suggesti
Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
> not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
> of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
>
> If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy
Hi,
The proposal to transition from the outdated g77 to gfortran did
not result any comments. Which rises the suspicion that the maintainers
of affected packages are not reading debian-release or debian-toolchain.
If you have suggestions, critique, or you are busy but accept NMU'ing
your packages
* Marc Dequènes [Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:40:10 +0200]:
> Is there a minimum number of packages involved to ask the release team
> for an autobuild binNUM ?
1
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at deb
* Julien Cristau [Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:53:05 +0200]:
> Hi,
> please add an unblock hint for brltty:
> unblock brltty/3.7.2-7.2
> This has been acked by Frans.
Added.
Thanks,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer
Sorry for the delay -- pyode will be uploaded shortly -- I thought
actually that I did already -- package was ready and just needs minor
testing (but requires major update of the "test" box ;-)).
> > Yes a rebuild is needed to link the package against the new
> > libode0debian1.
> Is there a mini
Hi,
please add an unblock hint for brltty:
unblock brltty/3.7.2-7.2
This has been acked by Frans.
Thanks,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coin,
Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes a rebuild is needed to link the package against the new
> libode0debian1.
Is there a minimum number of packages involved to ask the release team
for an autobuild binNUM ?
--
Marc Dequènes (Duck)
pgp8ae4YOz5er.pgp
Description: PGP sign
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> A few confusing things in the PTS entry for gpe-calendar and a problem
> with libhandoff:
> 1. gpe-calendar appears to be waiting for libgpevtype0-dev on arm,
> hppa, ia64, m68k and sparc but libgpevtype no longer builds
> libgpevtyp
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 07:27:44PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070721 18:51]:
> > Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > So, some ideas come to my mind:
> > > 1. delay glibc upload until glib transitioned to testing
> > > 2. do another upload with shlib bump after gli
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070721 18:51]:
> Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > So, some ideas come to my mind:
> > 1. delay glibc upload until glib transitioned to testing
> > 2. do another upload with shlib bump after glib transitioned to testing,
> > and wait with gcc to that upload.
> >
> >
Andreas Barth a écrit :
> * Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070721 00:33]:
>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>>> * Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070720 21:15]:
We (glibc maintainers) plan to do a change in glibc first. We will drop
libc6-sparcv9 a
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:11:54PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 01:29:47PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >Packages that depend on libode0c2: python-pyode, xmoto, python-soya,
> >python-pyepl, and indirectly:
>
> as of today those packages appear to be s
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 01:29:47PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>Packages that depend on libode0c2: python-pyode, xmoto, python-soya,
>python-pyepl, and indirectly:
as of today those packages appear to be still broken: (i.e. uninstallable in
unstable)
$ cat ftp.it.debian.org_debian_dis
A few confusing things in the PTS entry for gpe-calendar and a problem
with libhandoff:
1. gpe-calendar appears to be waiting for libgpevtype0-dev on arm,
hppa, ia64, m68k and sparc but libgpevtype no longer builds
libgpevtype0-dev, it builds libgpevtype-dev instead. gpe-calendar 0.90
depends on l
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070721 00:33]:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070720 21:15]:
> > > We (glibc maintainers) plan to do a change in glibc first. We will drop
> > > libc6-sparcv9 and change the optimizatio
19 matches
Mail list logo
