Re: Requeue bluez-libs on s390 and amd64

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:29:09AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote: > Hi Release-Team, > please have a look at: > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=bluez-libs > Since libbluetooth2 is a quite important library it would be nice to get > this new version into testing, can you please requeue a

Re: Bug#422841: How much of use is gtkmm2.0 anymore?

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 12:18:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > * glademm is not a problem anymore (NMUed). > > * patchage Buil-dep is useless (I see a bug is reported), could be > > NMUed. > > > * fireflier FTBFS and

Re: [OSRM] please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2

2007-07-18 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 11:28:39PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 23:24:19 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2 for the next sarge point release: > > > > > > apache2 (2.0.54-5sarge2) stable; urgency=low > > > >

Re: [OSRM] please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2

2007-07-18 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 23:24:19 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2 for the next sarge point release: > > > apache2 (2.0.54-5sarge2) stable; urgency=low > > * Fix some less critical security issues: > * Denial of service for threaded MPMs: >

[OSRM] please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2

2007-07-18 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Hi, please review apache2 2.0.54-5sarge2 for the next sarge point release: apache2 (2.0.54-5sarge2) stable; urgency=low * Fix some less critical security issues: * Denial of service for threaded MPMs: - CVE-2005-2970: mpm_worker memory leak - CVE-2005-3357: mod_ssl with custom error

Re: usbview 1.0-11

2007-07-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:50:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Could you please force usbview 1.0-11 into testing once SPARC has built? > The s390 porters have decided to mark the package as not-for-us, > presumably due to a lack of USB on s390 systems, but there is a s390 > binary currently in tes

Re: Bug#422841: How much of use is gtkmm2.0 anymore?

2007-07-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 03:05:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > * glademm is not a problem anymore (NMUed). > * patchage Buil-dep is useless (I see a bug is reported), could be > NMUed. > * fireflier FTBFS and is not maintained upstream anymore (and I'm > pretty sure it has way be

Re: read-edid

2007-07-18 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed Jul 18, 2007 at 17:48:18 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 16:42, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? > > > I just agree. > > So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable > > and include it in the next

Re: read-edid

2007-07-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Tuesday 03 July 2007 16:42, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? > > I just agree. > So, who can/will :) trigger a rebuild for read-edid on powerpc in stable > and include it in the next point release? > > P-a-s is fine since some time. /me is getting tired of sendi

Re: Bug#422841: How much of use is gtkmm2.0 anymore?

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:45:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > Hi, > > I think it might be better to get rid of this unbuildable package than to > fix it. gtkmm2.0 has been superseded by gtkmm2.4. there are only 4 packages > using gtkmm2.0 anymore: > > * fireflier > > gtkmm2.0 build-dep removed

please binNMU pyvorbis (fixes #424441)

2007-07-18 Thread Pierre Habouzit
I know I should provide a full binNMU list for python2.5 related packages, but at least this one is needed to fix the RC bug #424441. Probably other will follow. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO