Re: please requeue monotone for build on i386

2007-07-16 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/16/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > devel/monotone_0.35-2: Needs-Build [optional:out-of-date] > Previous state was Building until 2007 Jul 16 16:11:29 > -- which is incorrect Uh, no, it's not. The reason for the state change may not be at all obvious from the outside, but

Re: please requeue monotone for build on i386

2007-07-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 04:28:45PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > According to http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=monotone, version > 0.35-2 of this package has built successfully for all architectures > except arm (#432658, probably a gcc bug) and i386, where it has not > been attempted. > Accor

please requeue monotone for build on i386

2007-07-16 Thread Zack Weinberg
According to http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=monotone, version 0.35-2 of this package has built successfully for all architectures except arm (#432658, probably a gcc bug) and i386, where it has not been attempted. According to http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=i386&state=Needs-Build, de

gfortran transition release goal proposal

2007-07-16 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Camm Maguire writes: > > Greetings, and thanks for your report! Not applicable to gclcvs. > > nice to hear from you again; would you mind to join the discussion > around the g77 -> gfortran transition? see [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sure. I su

Advance warning of downtime on einval.com

2007-07-16 Thread Steve McIntyre
Quick warning - I'm moving ISP at the end of the month, which means that my home IP address(es) are going to change, and this in turn means that unfortunately there will be a short break in availability of the services running on various machines in the einval.com domain, including two of the build

Re: Bug#423933: libbfd-2.17.so not found

2007-07-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:56:08PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > I find four packages in the archive that are picking up a dependency on > > 'binutils' by way of shlibs: ggcov, nitpic, skyeye, and sysprof. > > nitpic needs libbfd-2.16.91.so, that's nice... > > ggcov, sysprof, and skyeye at leas

Re: Bug#423933: libbfd-2.17.so not found

2007-07-16 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Steve Langasek wrote: [snip] > I find four packages in the archive that are picking up a dependency on > 'binutils' by way of shlibs: ggcov, nitpic, skyeye, and sysprof. > > nitpic needs libbfd-2.16.91.so, that's nice... > > ggcov, sysprof, and skyeye at least manage to have binary packages in st