Re: [SRM] Request approval for a Trac package upload

At 1181131884 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote: > It makes Trac unusable for high volume project since it cannot handle > concurrent svn commits nicely. And it happens more frequently that we > would like. Ok, go ahead. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `'

Please requeue ninix-aya on arm and mipsel

Hi, According to the build log, http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=ninix-aya&ver=3.9.4-1&arch=arm&stamp=1178627366&file=log and http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=ninix-aya&ver=3.9.4-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1178413894&file=log It seems there are some strange things happened in python 2.4.4-3

Re: [SRM] Request approval for a Trac package upload

Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Otavio, > > At 1181021759 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to hear from SRM about they position about this upload? It's >> very important to us but I'd like to get an ACK before doing it. > > #425909 has no severity, so I can't

Re: read-edid

At 1180950380 time_t, Holger Levsen wrote: > SRMs, whats your opinion on this? I just agree. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Descripti

Re: [SRM] Request approval for a Trac package upload

Hi Otavio, At 1181021759 time_t, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to hear from SRM about they position about this upload? It's > very important to us but I'd like to get an ACK before doing it. #425909 has no severity, so I can't give you a ACK for this. I don't know trac and I can e