Dear release team,
I have just uploaded a NMU of openldap2, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
The NMU changelog is:
Source: openldap2
Version: 2.1.30-13.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris
On Saturday 17 February 2007 04:53, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I have just uploaded hdparm 6.9-2. This upload is entirely
> documentation updates. Hopefully you can see your way to unblocking it
> when the time comes. Please note, this package builds a udeb, but the
> udeb is not used by d-i. Comple
On 16 February 2007 at 21:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
| This is present in the debdiff:
|
| diff -Nru /tmp/cmWaq0sk4n/rggobi-2.1.4-2/debian/compat
/tmp/jsOBhqjdsu/rggobi-2.1.4-4/debian/compat
| --- /tmp/cmWaq0sk4n/rggobi-2.1.4-2/debian/compat1970-01-01
00:00:00.0 +
| +5
|
| T
On 16 February 2007 at 21:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:44:39PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 16 February 2007 at 17:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > Release team:
|
| > | > I just
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:44:39PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 16 February 2007 at 17:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > Release team:
> | > I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
> | > with the changel
Steve,
On 16 February 2007 at 17:55, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Release team:
|
| > I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
| > with the changelog entry below. This should hopefully make
| > it into et
Hello all,
I have just uploaded hdparm 6.9-2. This upload is entirely
documentation updates. Hopefully you can see your way to unblocking it
when the time comes. Please note, this package builds a udeb, but the
udeb is not used by d-i. Complete diff attached.
Thanks,
--
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:20:54PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> it fixes a security bug:
> http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-0803 and
> #410864, but it is an upstream update.
This upstream update appears to include a significant number of unrelated
changes. Please isolate t
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:39AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This contains a small configuration update so that the installation interacts
> properly with the kolab-resource-manager package.
> kolab-webadmin (0.4.0-20060810-4) unstable; urgency=medium
>* Install the apache.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:17:55PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Release team:
> I just uploaded rggobi into testing-proposed-updates
> with the changelog entry below. This should hopefully make
> it into etch.
The package uploaded to t-p-u still includes a change to the d
Hello.
op-panel was removed from testing due some destar/op-panel rc bugs. they
were fixed in destar 0.2.0-4 and op-panel 0.26.dfsg-6 packages.
Also, some copyright statements we're missing on op-panel, but this has been
fixed on the op-panel 0.26.dfsg-6 version recently uploaded
by Santiago to
Dear release team,
I have just uploaded a NMU of php-json-ext, to fix its pending l10n
issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
The NMU changelog is:
Source: php-json-ext
Version: 1.2.1-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: C
[cc shortened]
Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le jeudi 8 février 2007 22:17, Steve Langasek a écrit :
>> > I think the bug #388616 should be granted this etc-ignore. The
>> > configuration file is never shiped with the package nor generated by the
>> > software. It is generated in co
On Friday 16 February 2007 21:07, Frans Pop wrote:
> As testing is currently unusable anyway, I've decided to start the
> migration of udebs to testing, as a slow preparation for RC2.
Right, so here goes.
1) Feel free to remove loop-aes-modules from testing.
2) Hints for packages providing udebs
Due to the expiration of the 2006 key, the RC1 D-I and CD images, and also
the weekly CDs have become mostly unusable.
Doing a D-I release without a kernel that is at least intended to be
released with Etch available in testing is a pointless exercise, however
leaving users without any full CD/D
Quoting Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Dear release team,
> >
> > I have just uploaded a NMU of atokx2, to fix its pending l10n
> > issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
> >
> > Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
>
> No, it's not part of testi
Hi Release Managers,
I've made some changes to lzma's documentation and copyright file in
4.43-4 and 4.43-5.
Could you please allow lzma 4.43-5 in Etch?
| lzma (4.43-5) unstable; urgency=low
|
| * Tighten license issues in debian/copyright: (Closes: #406968)
| + LZMA SDK is relea
Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> update-manager: addition of a slovak translation
>>> unblock update-manager/0.42.2ubuntu22-10
>> debian/po*s*/sk.po ??!
>
> Yes; weird system to override the po/ of upstream. I suppose these
> could be patches instead, but I imagi
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I have just uploaded a NMU of atokx2, to fix its pending l10n
> issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
>
> Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
No, it's not part of testing and no detailed rationale to add it has been given.
C
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I have just uploaded a NMU of tmpreaper, to fix its pending l10n
> issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
>
> Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
Unblocked.
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I have just uploaded a NMU of pconsole, to fix its pending l10n
> issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
>
> Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
Unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did an upload of Ipe last month that I believe could be allowed
> into testing and the next stable release.
>
> The update contained no code change, but only configuration changes so
> that Ipe may be used with both tetex and texlive flavours of LaTeX
> (fix
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 05:15:39PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> We plan to upload a new glibc aiming at etch, version 2.3.6.ds1-12.
> Except for a minor (obvious) change to the changelog, the diff should be:
>
> http://madism.org/~madcoder/pub/glibc_2.3.6.ds1-12.diff
>
> Would it be o
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007, Luk Claes wrote:
> > update-manager: addition of a slovak translation
> > unblock update-manager/0.42.2ubuntu22-10
> debian/po*s*/sk.po ??!
Yes; weird system to override the po/ of upstream. I suppose these
could be patches instead, but I imagine it's easier to maintain t
24 matches
Mail list logo
