Re: Bug#397129: apt: depends on lower priority package

2006-11-05 Thread Christian Perrier
> > Quoting Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): (original bug report) > > > Package: apt > > > Version: 0.6.46.2 > > > Severity: serious > > > Justification: Policy 2.5 > > > > > > apt is of priority "important" and depends on debian-archive-keyring > > > which is of priority "standard". > > >

Bin-NMU debootstrap?

2006-11-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I've verified that rebuilding debootstrap on MIPS fixes #397091, which presumably is blocking successful d-i on MIPS. Would a bin-NMU be appropriate for this? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA

Re: Notice and explanation for three uploads of frozen packages

2006-11-05 Thread Luk Claes
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, Hi Manoj > I have made three uploads of packages that are currently > frozen, and here are the usual excuses. > > a) libselinux: The python-selinux package was mostly empty when run > on buildd's since sometimes a timing problem when creating the >

Notice and explanation for three uploads of frozen packages

2006-11-05 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, I have made three uploads of packages that are currently frozen, and here are the usual excuses. a) libselinux: The python-selinux package was mostly empty when run on buildd's since sometimes a timing problem when creating the source from .dsc makes make think that the swig

Re: Please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk for i386

2006-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > There seems to have been something wrong with my i386 pbuilder when uploading > apache2-mpm-itk, hindering its testing migration: > apache2-mpm-itk (- to 2.2.3-01-1) > Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson > Too young, only

Please binNMU apache2-mpm-itk for i386

2006-11-05 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Hi, There seems to have been something wrong with my i386 pbuilder when uploading apache2-mpm-itk, hindering its testing migration: apache2-mpm-itk (- to 2.2.3-01-1) Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson Too young, only 1 of 10 days old apache2-mpm-itk/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: apache2.2-co

Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:03:32AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Luk Claes wrote: > > > If it's only about the security bug, I don't think it's a good idea to > > > remove > > > giflib from testing at this time as the bug can eas

Re: Remove giflib from testing

2006-11-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Luk Claes wrote: > > If it's only about the security bug, I don't think it's a good idea to > > remove > > giflib from testing at this time as the bug can easily be fixed by giflib > > leaving the NEW queue or patching giflib 3 AFAI