Hi Steve,
On 10/14/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has been given back now and built successfully.
thanks a lot for helping.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
Summary of the situation: libosmesa6 (offscreen opengl rendering)
is currently included inside
libgl1-mesa-swx11 (source: mesa) and libgl1-mesa-glide3 (source:
mesa-legacy). Both packages conflict with any other libgl1 provider,
most notably libgl1-mesa-glx, which is a must-have on most modern
des
Hi,
we have frozen today all kernel helpers (i.e. tools building initrds
etc), and also the boot loaders.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Hubert Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 22:19]:
> Currently, gnustep-core-devel, from meta-gnustep, depends on
> libgnustep-base1.11-dbg and libgnustep-gui0.10-dbg, which will no
> longer be available with the new GNUstep libraries. Which I think
> would prevent the migration to testing.
I don'
[dropping the bug report from the Cc: list]
On 2006-10-14 03:23:16 -0400 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:11:51PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
>> Ugh. It looks like the GNUstep transition is being further held up by
>> recent NMUs:
>>
>> - gnustep-netclasses
>
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 20:33]:
> Obviously this adds enough human element to avoid a CD that installs
> windows, but what then is the cutoff point? Would a CD that
> auto-installs debian-edu be able to be called an "Debian CD"?
> What about a CD that only changes the default deskto
Andreas Barth wrote:
> ==begin draft==
> Any CD/DVD image needs to (I'll just write CD now for lazyness):
> - CD-lintian doesn't report errors (as soon as we have it);
> - CD uses the official d-i (of course, preseeding is ok), or if otherwise
> agreed by the d-i RMs (which are currently Joey Hes
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 08:45:05PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> I have sent several mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about building
> libavg, but I did not get any answer and the package has never been
> built on this architecture for invalid (means: historic) reasons. The
> 'Dep-Wait:' you can see at
Hi
Can someone please schedule binNMUs for:
pike-public.parser.xml2_1.38-2, rebuild against pike7.6 (>= 7.6.93), 1, alpha,
amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
pike-public.network.pcap_1.2-4, rebuild against pike7.6 (>= 7.6.93), 1, alpha,
amd64, arm, hppa, i386, i
Frans Pop wrote:
> Please also add the following packages to testing/hints/freeze:
> * udebs, could be handled by britney
> block gtk2-engines
>
> * udebs, need manual approval
> block auto-install
> block glantank
> block partman-auto-raid
> block linux-modules-di-alpha-2.6
> block linux-modules-
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:40:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:52:05AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> > > If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and
> > > parrot will need
* Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 13:55]:
> Hello,
> it has been pointed out to me on IRC that debian/copyright needs to
> actually contain a copy of used licenses not shipped in
> /usr/share/common-licenses/, saying "complete text of license is
> available in " is not good enough.
>
>
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 13:49]:
> I would appreciate it if we would not make hard decisions/statements on
> this NOW, but first await the post-etch discussion (or better
> investigation) on how, as a project, we can and want to support hardware
> that is technically non-free in t
Hello,
it has been pointed out to me on IRC that debian/copyright needs to
actually contain a copy of used licenses not shipped in
/usr/share/common-licenses/, saying "complete text of license is
available in " is not good enough.
Ganneff: I guess the missing FDL copy is serious. - Correct?
[...]
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 11:43 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Please exercise more caution when sponsoring NMUs prepared by the submitters
> > of bugs. It's clear that you didn't verify this bug yourself before
> > uploading, and the most this upload has done is to delay the g
On Saturday 14 October 2006 13:32, Andreas Barth wrote:
--cut--
> > Oh, and
> > another point: so live-cds are not official CDs, according to this
> > definition ("All software that ends up on the installed system..."). I
> > think it would be nice to have official live-cds.
>
> These guidelines we
On Saturday 14 October 2006 12:25, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 12:19]:
> > What happens with the {non-free,firmware} images which will be needed
> > for etch+1 for many of our users?
>
> They will be on CD, of course. "DFSG-free" means whatever it means for
>
Hi,
* Holger Levsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 12:19]:
> On Saturday 14 October 2006 11:10, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > - All "official" packages are the same as on ftp.d.o, additional packages
> > can be in other directories;
>
> Do I understand this correctly, that I can make a official debian
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 12:08:33PM +0200, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > we (Steve McIntyre, Martin Zobel-Helas and me) discussed what is an official
> > Debian CD. Frankly speaking, we should be able to produce officia
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 12:19]:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > we (Steve McIntyre, Martin Zobel-Helas and me) discussed what is an official
> > Debian CD. Frankly speaking, we should be able to produce official CDs for
> > handing out at fai
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> we (Steve McIntyre, Martin Zobel-Helas and me) discussed what is an official
> Debian CD. Frankly speaking, we should be able to produce official CDs for
> handing out at fairs. However, to allow us to do that efficiently, we tried
>
Please push the new netbase and openbsd-inetd in testing, they implement
the new *inetd architecture which was discussed on debian-devel last
month.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Saturday 14 October 2006 11:10, Andreas Barth wrote:
> CDs for handing out at fairs. However, to allow us to do that efficiently,
> we tried to come out with some guidelines. Of course, currently this is a
> draft, and we welcome feedback.
Overall it looks good & short :) One question (or
Steve Langasek wrote:
Please exercise more caution when sponsoring NMUs prepared by the submitters
of bugs. It's clear that you didn't verify this bug yourself before
uploading, and the most this upload has done is to delay the gnustep
transition.
I am very sorry about that and I promise that
Hi,
we (Steve McIntyre, Martin Zobel-Helas and me) discussed what is an official
Debian CD. Frankly speaking, we should be able to produce official CDs for
handing out at fairs. However, to allow us to do that efficiently, we tried
to come out with some guidelines. Of course, currently this is a d
Please also add the following packages to testing/hints/freeze:
* udebs, could be handled by britney
block gtk2-engines
* udebs, need manual approval
block auto-install
block glantank
block partman-auto-raid
block linux-modules-di-alpha-2.6
block linux-modules-di-amd64-2.6
block linux-modules-di-a
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061014 09:56]:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:07:22AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 05:23]:
> > > Changing this would allow installs to not have the whole dependency
> > > tree of gnupg, while still providing the upgr
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 08:07:22AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 05:23]:
> > Changing this would allow installs to not have the whole dependency
> > tree of gnupg, while still providing the upgrade path that the recent
> > upload of apt was done to provid
severity 392376 minor
thanks
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 03:11:51PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
> Ugh. It looks like the GNUstep transition is being further held up by
> recent NMUs:
>
> - gnustep-netclasses
This doesn't hold anything up /further/, when this is the first build of the
package that isn
29 matches
Mail list logo
