Ugh. It looks like the GNUstep transition is being further held up by
recent NMUs:
- gnustep-netclasses
- steptalk (an NMU for a bug that's only one day old???)
As I mentioned in my previous mail, these are superseded by packages
stuck in NEW, and so they should be able to be removed from te
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>
> > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > >> I would like to schedule the upload of linux-2.6 2.6.18-3 for next
> > >> Thursday, 12th October.
>
> >
On Friday 13 October 2006 17:50, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I would very much like to see 2.6.18 in testing for rc1. Looking at
> > the bug page, I don't really see any indication that 2.6.18 is a
> > regression overall wrt 2.6.17, so
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:41:07PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would very much like to see 2.6.18 in testing for rc1. Looking at the bug
> page, I don't really see any indication that 2.6.18 is a regression overall
> wrt 2.6.17, so aside from sorting out the hppa build failure, I would say
>
On 10/13/06, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and
> parrot will need to be hinted into etch together but this is not yet
> possible because boost and parr
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-1
Severity: critical
Justification: possible filesystem corruption
Hi release and kernel teams,
Following up to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/10/msg00183.html :
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 10:11:06AM -0700, Kevin B. McCarty wro
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:38:31PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> madduck as the maintainer asked me to drop a note here:
> Please remove thinkpad and tpctl from testing (bugs #392235 and
> #392239), summary below.
> thinkpad (source package) kernel modules do not seem to compile with
> linux 2.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 09:52:05AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> > If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and
> > parrot will need to be hinted into etch together but this is not yet
> > possible because
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and
> parrot will need to be hinted into etch together but this is not yet
> possible because boost and parrot have other issues right now that
> prevent them from movin
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:47:20PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > The author states that "the package is under GPLv2"
>
>> The author at least stated (in the bug log) that he's going to clean up
>> the licensing, and it's going to be either GPL or LPPL.
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:29:46PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Changing this would allow installs to not have the whole dependency
> tree of gnupg, while still providing the upgrade path that the recent
> upload of apt was done to provide.
>
> [Upgrades would install debian-archive-keyring, whic
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Therefore I request to set the sarge-ignore tags on both bugs that are
>> still open.
>
> I assume you mean etch-ignore. Yes, sounds good.
Yes, better that way.
Thanks, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst.
* peter green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061013 14:48]:
> could theese be removed from testing to allow gaim 2 to drop in?
I'll wait till gaim 2 is old enough, and then make sure gaim 2 gets in.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
the further debians version of gaim gets from where upstream releases the
harder it gets to backport security updates and/or fixes for severe
breakages, in both woody and sarge it seems gaim was therefore left with
outstanding security bugs before the releases lifetime was over.
it would therefore
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> cdbs (0.4.47) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
Any news on this?
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'll work this weekend a bit on having a list of etch-only-RC bugs which
needs an unblock. Now my question is, what is the optimal format?
Just a list of bugs, sorted by (source) package?
Or also display the changelog to each source package?
Or ...?
(For the newcomers, there is ~aba/bin/d on
* Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-12 22:52]:
> * Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > What needs to be done for alpha? Does it FTBFS with gcc 4.1?
> Yes.
>
> > Anybody can run a build and make the log available?
>
> Tomorrow.
FWIW, Falk Hueffner prepared the following patch which just needs
t
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 01:25:37PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> If my analysis/understanding is correct, icu, xerces27, boost, and
> parrot will need to be hinted into etch together but this is not yet
> possible because boost and parrot have other issues right now that
> ...
boost build look
18 matches
Mail list logo
