Surely we have cared cursed beauty out villa, watching. Surely, we were no more
than the compound and in the Sea; little
puxkjx.gif
Description: GIF image
Good Afternoon,
Would you like to generate 1.5K to 3.5K a day just for returning calls?
If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified.
Get in contact with us : 800-372-4715
Goodbye,
Robert Davison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Eric,
thanks for your reply. I forgot to remove the backports
from /etc/apt/preferences, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2006/10/msg00862.html
for details.
I cc'ed debian-release, because it might be worth of adding a small comment to
the release notes, I am almost sure that I am not
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just today mike emmel fixed the "boom" bug, it should technically
> possible switching to GTK+ 2.10.x.
Repeating this here for other readers: 2.10.6-2 in experimental was
uploaded today with the fix.
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To
Please add the following packages to testing/hints/freeze:
* udebs, could be handled by britney
block debian-edu-archive-keyring
* udebs, need manual approval
block flash-kernel
block partman-auto-crypto
Please hint the following packages for migration (if not already hinted):
unblock gtk+2.0/2.
Hi,
I have sent several mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about building
libavg, but I did not get any answer and the package has never been
built on this architecture for invalid (means: historic) reasons. The
'Dep-Wait:' you can see at http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libavg
is just wrong. It wou
Frans Pop wrote:
=== D-I STRING FREEZE: Thu 12 Okt, 00:00 UTC - Sun 22 Okt, 00:00 UTC ===
Hi folks,
This mail really should have gone out at least two and probably three
weeks earlier. Blame goes to the discussions on d-{private,vote,wherever}
which resulted in a serious drop in my motivation
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.08.1813 +0200]:
> You've neglected to mention both the architecture and the version
> of the broken package. I don't see anything of the sort in
> unstable.
Hm, lesson #253: do not run lintian on sarge on packages build for
unstable.
Sorry,
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
> e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
> which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
You've neglected to mention both the
Hi
Can someone please schedule a binNMU for:
kdesvn_0.9.3-1, rebuild for libapr1, 1, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
kdesvn's binary packages do only depend on libapr0 indirectly via libsvn-dev
(via libsvn0) build-dep, so a dep-wait for libsvn1 might be in order
Hi,
please remove rageircd from testing. It is unlikely that the existing
RC bugs are going to be fixed in time for etch due to lack of upstream
support.
Greetings
Marc, rageircd maintainer
--
-
Marc Haber | "I
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:46:02AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the release of etch approaching, it would be nice to do a lot of
> archive-wide QA work. However, such work has generally been done without
> much synchronization/coordination, and the draft QA report[0] is nearly
> emp
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 01:29:00PM +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
> e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
> which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
>
> I guess a si
libglu1-mesa depends on libstdc++5 and thus causes problems with
e.g. xlockmore-gl, which links against a lot of libraries, all of
which but libglu1-mesa using libstdc++6. this is not good.
I guess a simple recompile of the package would do the trick.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to
=== D-I STRING FREEZE: Thu 12 Okt, 00:00 UTC - Sun 22 Okt, 00:00 UTC ===
Hi folks,
This mail really should have gone out at least two and probably three
weeks earlier. Blame goes to the discussions on d-{private,vote,wherever}
which resulted in a serious drop in my motivation in recent weeks an
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:43:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:46:42AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061002 08:38]:
> > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:02:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:46:17AM +0200,
16 matches
Mail list logo
