Re: Hint openssl to testing.

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:02:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:46:17AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Could you please hint openssl to testing? It's frozen because it has > > udebs. > > Already done, will go in as soon as it's aged another day. I see a hint in aba

Re: Who declares optional packages extra?

Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > Hi, > > Also, I'm slightly worried about the 6 non-depending packages made > uninstallable on arm, according to > . Is this just > bogus or what? No, it's not bogus. It's a result of not having arm binary packages

Re: Bug#390583: cupsys build against nonexistent libdbus-1-2

At Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:22:40 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Package: cupsys > Version: 1.2.4-2 > Severity: grave > > cupsys-1.2.4-2 was compiled against libdbus-1-2 which is not available > in the archive anymore. This makes the package uninstallable. > Scheduling binNMUs for i386 should be suffici

Re: Please hint tzdata to testing

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 10:35:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > tzdata is currently frozen, but I believe it should go into testing. It > only contains a minor update of the timezone data. > Moreover this package has been splitted from the glibc, so that it can > be easily updated (even in st

Re: Would an ABI change of apt for DDTP support still be accepted?

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 11:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:35:19AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 07:13:21PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > >> Would you still accept an ABI change of apt to support description > > >> translations into etch

Re: BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 06:20:26PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: > OpenSER 1.1.0-3 suffered from a gcc/buildd problem on arm, leading to > an empty openser-jabber-module package on arm (#390005, RC). > A test build on arm went fine, so a binNMU should fix this. Scheduled, but a package that genera

Re: Who declares optional packages extra?

On 10794 March 1977, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: >> libginac1.3c2a-dbg_1.3.5-1_i386.deb: package says priority is >> optional, override says extra. > Last time I uploaded that package (then > libginac1.3c2a-dbg_1.3.4-1_i386.deb) it was optional. (I've just checked > the old upload file.) Did it real

Re: Who declares optional packages extra?

Richard B Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Last time I uploaded that package (then > libginac1.3c2a-dbg_1.3.4-1_i386.deb) it was optional. (I've just checked > the old upload file.) Did it really spontaneously become extra? If so, > why? ftp-master sets the priorities in the overrides file.

Who declares optional packages extra?

Hi, Debian Installer wrote: There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libginac1.3c2a-dbg_1.3.5-1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says extra. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you

Owner was just laid off

ATTN . Would you like to make at least 1.5K to 3.5K per day just for returning calls? If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified. Get in contact with us - 888-705-1353 Thank you, Freddie Davison -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Please hint tzdata to testing

Hi, tzdata is currently frozen, but I believe it should go into testing. It only contains a minor update of the timezone data. Moreover this package has been splitted from the glibc, so that it can be easily updated (even in stable), so I think there is no point in blocking it to reach testi

Re: After upgrade to etch, power off after shutdown does not work any more

* Rainer Dorsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061001 18:50]: > Not sure if there is an easy way to avoid that others have to search for this > information as well. Little effort would be to add this to the release > notes... and a big benefit for the guys with old hardware who read release > notes ;-) T

After upgrade to etch, power off after shutdown does not work any more

Hello, I upgraded an (old) system from sarge to etch, which was impressive, almost everything worked out of the box as in sarge (only better due to new software:-) The only flaw I saw is that after running "shutdown -h now" power is not shut down any more. Since the system is old, it uses apm

Please hint xulrunner

Hi, I forgot to push the urgency to high for the last xulrunner upload, which fixes quite some security issues which are important for galeon, epiphany, kazehakase, etc. users. Now that it is built on all arches (except m68k), could you push it to testing ? Thanks Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

BinNMU request for openser 1.1.0-3 on arm

Hi, OpenSER 1.1.0-3 suffered from a gcc/buildd problem on arm, leading to an empty openser-jabber-module package on arm (#390005, RC). A test build on arm went fine, so a binNMU should fix this. Thanks, JB. -- Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more Debian &

Xen 3.0.3 for Etch

Hi folks Upstream forked a 3.0.3 tree a week ago. I hope they will release it in the next two weeks. I think it will be a good idea to release this with Etch. This may be also a good target as RHEL5 will also release with Linux 2.6.18 (we use their xen patch for the kernel already) and Xen 3.0.3.

Re: please build the mew-beta package for mips and m68k

On September 28, 2006 at 8:53AM -0500, stephen (at marenka.net) wrote: > > Could anyone remove the Dep-Wait status to build the mew-beta package? > > done for m68k. Thanks, the status of m68k is now `Needs build' and the status of mips is now `installed'. -- Tatsuya Kinoshita pgpXKz58jq1QQ.pgp

Re: [Etch] Please allow docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 to propagate into Etch

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 01:33:42PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > I would like to ask for docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 in Etch. Where were you looking that you think it isn't there already? :) docbook-xsl | 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 | testing | source, all docbook-xsl | 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 | unstabl

[Etch] Please allow docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 to propagate into Etch

Hello, I would like to ask for docbook-xsl 1.71.0.dfsg.1-1 in Etch. This version fixed several bugs reported to the BTS (there are still 2 bugs not in the BTS I would like to close and have in Etch). Further we changed the maintainer and the current version in Etch still lists MJ as maintainer, wh

Re: Please allow ltsp to propagate into etch

On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 10:29:48AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > A new LTSP package was uploaded yesterday to fix a serious bug in the > udeb. Before that, the previous upload had stayed 11 days in unstable > without any new problems reported. The new package fixed the RC bugs > and some m

Please allow ltsp to propagate into etch

A new LTSP package was uploaded yesterday to fix a serious bug in the udeb. Before that, the previous upload had stayed 11 days in unstable without any new problems reported. The new package fixed the RC bugs and some minor other issues, and was given priority high because of the RC fix. The lt