Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Yes, it can be and is configured by source package. If you can get some > > numbers to the buildd admin (James) about how long it should take fo

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:15:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Yes, it can be and is configured by source package. If you can get some > > numbers to the buildd admin (James) about how lo

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it can be and is configured by source package. If you can get some > numbers to the buildd admin (James) about how long it should take for these > packages to build, it should be straightforward to fix up t

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Compiling Java interface classes > > find _javagen -name "*.java" > java.files > > /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac -source 1.4 -classpath . -d . -sourcepath > > _javagen @java.files > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDef

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Lennart Sorensen writes: > Well xulrunner seems to have an issue with javac based on this last part > of the build log: > > Compiling Java interface classes > find _javagen -name "*.java" > java.files > /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javac -source 1.4 -classpath . -d . -sourcepath > _javagen @java.fil

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:43:56PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well xulrunner seems to have an issue with javac based on this last part > of the build log: Waw, I must say I'm impressed that for once in a while it doesn't abort ld because it takes too much time to do its

Re: arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:13:06PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > we (the release team) noticed that arm has had some autobuilding and porting > problems in the past few weeks. According to the most recent britney runs, > the current numbers of uncompiled binaries are these: > 110 mips > 116

arm release issues

2006-08-28 Thread Andreas Barth
[ Cced all the people who are listed as arm porters on the release wiki ] Hi, we (the release team) noticed that arm has had some autobuilding and porting problems in the past few weeks. According to the most recent britney runs, the current numbers of uncompiled binaries are these: 110 mips