Re: D-I Beta3 preparation - more requests

2006-08-02 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:09, Luk Claes wrote: >> Frans Pop wrote: >>> First, please add the following packages that provide udebs to the >>> freeze file at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/freeze >>> >>> - "could be handled by britney" >>> pcmciautils >> All done

Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with

2006-08-02 Thread Nathanael Nerode
The kernel freeze must be delayed quite significantly for a fairly obvious reason: the Debian kernel *still* has a lot of non-free and sourceless firmware in it. Unfortunately, little to no progress has been made on this. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this is pretty obvious from

Re: advice for gnucash on alpha procedure

2006-08-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > gnucash currently has an RC bug on alpha; the program essentially no > workie. Upstream does not have access to an alpha, nor do I, and mail > to debian-alpha has not as yet turned up anyone who says "hey, here's > an alpha with the build dependen

advice for gnucash on alpha procedure

2006-08-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
gnucash currently has an RC bug on alpha; the program essentially no workie. Upstream does not have access to an alpha, nor do I, and mail to debian-alpha has not as yet turned up anyone who says "hey, here's an alpha with the build dependencies which you can debug on", nor has it turned up anyon

Re: D-I Beta3 preparation - more requests

2006-08-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 23:09, Luk Claes wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > First, please add the following packages that provide udebs to the > > freeze file at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/freeze > > > > - "could be handled by britney" > > pcmciautils > > All done Looks like pcmcia

Re: D-I Beta3 preparation - more requests

2006-08-02 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote: > First, please add the following packages that provide udebs to the freeze > file at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/freeze > > - "could be handled by britney" > dmraid > ext2resize > gtk+2.0 > libsdl1.2 > pcmciautils > ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts > > > Next, please add

D-I Beta3 preparation - more requests

2006-08-02 Thread Frans Pop
First, please add the following packages that provide udebs to the freeze file at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/freeze - "could be handled by britney" dmraid ext2resize gtk+2.0 libsdl1.2 pcmciautils ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts Next, please add the following hints; not all are old enough

Re: Packages awaiting proposed-updates moderation

2006-08-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:51:27PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > I think this list misses a step: > - package gets built for other architectures by buildds Good point. It fits in: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:32:55PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > 1. Package gets uploaded (queue/unchecked) > 2. Package

Re: Decision about oot-modules for etch

2006-08-02 Thread Daniel Baumann
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Can you make an announcement to all oot-module maintainers, telling them > that they should put their packages together into linux-modules-extra > (for main) or a similar one for contrib, and if they're not doing it, > they will end up in an unsupported (no updates for point

Request for transition: evolution-data-server

2006-08-02 Thread Øystein Gisnås
The new upstream version of evolution-data-server, 2.6.3, creates a library package with soname change. libegroupwise1.2-10 is replaced by libegroupwise1.2-12. The only rdepends outside of the source package is evolution, which is binNMU safe. We also plan an upload of evolution shortly, but rath

Re: Packages awaiting proposed-updates moderation

2006-08-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 10:50, Loïc Minier wrote: > I don't quite understand the various steps that a package traverses > when uploaded to SPU. Is some document explaining that? In short, I > would just like to understand the number of steps, the human-triggered > transitions, and the pub

Re: Packages awaiting proposed-updates moderation

2006-08-02 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Anthony Towns wrote: > Hope this helps. Perfect, thanks! -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Packages awaiting proposed-updates moderation

2006-08-02 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:50:25AM +0200, Lo?c Minier wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > for those who wonder why their package did not yet hit proposed-updates, > > they want to have a look on [1] and [2]. > I don't quite understand the various steps that a package trave

Re: Packages awaiting proposed-updates moderation

2006-08-02 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Wed, Aug 02, 2006, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > for those who wonder why their package did not yet hit proposed-updates, > they want to have a look on [1] and [2]. That's great, thanks! I don't quite understand the various steps that a package traverses when uploaded to SPU. Is

Re: Shadow updates for sarge (was: )Re: Packages awaiting proposed-updates moderation)

2006-08-02 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, > Given that I'm away for 3 weeks from now, I leave all this in the > hands of my co-maintainer, Nicolas François (nekral on IRC). Please > get in touch with him for ANY issue related to shadow (please CC me or > [EMAIL PROTECTED]). His mail address is CC'ed > to this mail and he is mentioned