Linux 2.6.16 for testing

2006-07-09 Thread Bastian Blank
Hi folks After some private discussion how to provide a kernel for the debian-installer beta3 release, there was the decision to upload linux-latest-2.6 which provides the necessary metapackages to testing-proposed-updates. This should be uploaded either tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. The me

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-07-09 Thread Frans Pop
On Sunday 09 July 2006 21:59, Frans Pop wrote: > Seems like the i386 packages have now made it in. Still missing: > - linux-kernel-di-arm > - linux-kernel-di-m68k > - linux-kernel-di-mips > - linux-kernel-di-mipsel > - linux-kernel-di-powerpc Oops. Did not look correctly: i386 is still missing too

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-07-09 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 07 July 2006 18:31, Frans Pop wrote: > Most of the new kernel udeb packages are now in p-u, except for those > that did not have to go through NEW: [...] > Please approve these for p-u ASAP. Seems like the i386 packages have now made it in. Still missing: - linux-kernel-di-arm - linux-ke

Re: "Security" fix for shadow in sarge (#356939)

2006-07-09 Thread Martin Schulze
Christian Perrier wrote: > As a consequence, I hereby ask the security team to DROP the processing > of the 4.0.3-31sarge6 version you have. As you wish, packages deleted. Regards, Joey -- Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect. Please always C

Re: keeping old library versions in testing

2006-07-09 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, * Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060708 23:00]: > [...] > Ok, that was what I wanted to have. This patch would reduce the amount > to bring in transitions into testing dramatically. > [...] > I'm not really a dpkg hacker, but it *seems* to me that this doesn't > generate memory pollution.