Hi,
At Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:27:56 +0200,
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 12:06]:
> > > Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built
> > > on arm, which s
Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Recently I've been investigating the xine-lib build failure on sparc. It
> turned out that failure occured due to libavcodec, shipped as a part of
> xine-lib, using the sparc64-specific assembler instructions in
> some routines (without providing any generic arch-independen
Hi,
Recently I've been investigating the xine-lib build failure on sparc. It
turned out that failure occured due to libavcodec, shipped as a part of
xine-lib, using the sparc64-specific assembler instructions in
some routines (without providing any generic arch-independent replacement
for the
Mike:
As a DD, I have access to leisner. It's not a buildd, though.
Feel free to consult with the powers that be to turn it into a buildd,
if that's possible.
or a build on something faster than leisner
Good luck with that. :) Compared to even a mediocre PC, ARM machines
aren't kn
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:02:53AM -0500, Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have physical ownership of leisner.debian.org (armel), though I'm not
> a DD and not the buildd admin. Is there something I can do to restart
> the build? Top says that leisner is idling.
As a DD, I have acc
Guys:
I contacted the buildd admin first, without any answer. Then asked for a
porter build on debian-arm without much more success, though at least,
the message got answers. Note that it's not the first time xulrunner
fails in such a manner. It's just that the buildd is too slow and
doesn't wa
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 13:28]:
> I contacted the buildd admin first, without any answer. Then asked for a
> porter build on debian-arm without much more success, though at least,
> the message got answers. Note that it's not the first time xulrunner
> fails in such a manner. It's
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:27:56PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 12:06]:
> > > Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:55:30PM +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 12:06]:
> > Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built
> > on arm, which seem to be not likely to happen soonish :(
> > Could you hint xulrunne
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:16:51AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>> >>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 12:06]:
> Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built
> on arm, which seem to be not likely to happen soonish :(
> Could you hint xulrunner in, despite arm not being built yet ?
Hm, I'm not so happy with that for obvious reasons.
Hi,
Important security fixes for testing are waiting xulrunner to be built
on arm, which seem to be not likely to happen soonish :(
Could you hint xulrunner in, despite arm not being built yet ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
12 matches
Mail list logo
