Re: epiphany-browser testing status.

2006-06-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 07:34:29AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > "Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think epiphany-browser[0] (23 days old, no RC bugs), > > epiphany-extensions and gwget2 are valid candidates to enter testing. > > epiphany-browser isn't building on m68k , b

Re: epiphany-browser testing status.

2006-06-29 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
"Gustavo Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think epiphany-browser[0] (23 days old, no RC bugs), > epiphany-extensions and gwget2 are valid candidates to enter testing. > epiphany-browser isn't building on m68k , but... :-) > > Thoughts? -browser is a valid candidate, but the new release brea

epiphany-browser testing status.

2006-06-29 Thread Gustavo Franco
Hi team, I think epiphany-browser[0] (23 days old, no RC bugs), epiphany-extensions and gwget2 are valid candidates to enter testing. epiphany-browser isn't building on m68k , but... :-) Thoughts? [0] =http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=epiphany-browser regards, -- stratus -- To

Re: Reclaiming automake

2006-06-29 Thread Eric Dorland
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in > > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debian[0]. > > > > [0] Their plan, which mirrors mine, is documented h

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > >> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn the >> kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o > >hey Steve: would you mind rebuilding this o

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > For most architectures this looks OK, except for the following: > - AMD64 kernel udebs don't match as AMD64 kernel image not yet on > s.d.o nothing to do till amd64 makes it > - S/390 kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o I wi

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread dann frazier
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:59:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:40, Frans Pop wrote: > > - dannf has updated 2.2.25 kernel udebs for m68k, but I can find no > > matching security update for those on s.d.o > > Probably this is not an issue. > I suspect there actually is

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > - m68k kernel udebs were originally built incorrectly; I understood this > has been corrected but new udebs are not yet available in gluck:~dannf Should still be at gluck:~smarenka/m68k-lkdi-take2 -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:40, Frans Pop wrote: > - dannf has updated 2.2.25 kernel udebs for m68k, but I can find no > matching security update for those on s.d.o Probably this is not an issue. I suspect there actually is no security update for the m68k 2.2.25 kernels. The kernel udebs do ma

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 23 June 2006 23:07, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > We have no fixed "freeze" date for r3 yet, but i currently plan to > freeze one or two weeks after the pending 2.6 kernel update is pushed > by the security team. If this is not enough time for the porters, > please cluebat me. Current stat