Re: ia32-libs update for sarge

2006-06-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I just wanted the release team now about the plans to update ia32-libs to know > in sarge. The updates will just bring the ia64/amd64 packages back in > sync with the actual i386 sarge versions. So all this

Re: [Pkg-pciutils-discuss] Re: Updating of pci.ids in Etch

2006-06-16 Thread Martin Mares
Hello! > I also wonder if stripping down the pci.ids file in pciutils-udeb > further so it only covers NICs might be worthwhile to save space in d-i. > 230k is still a lot of space for the above functionality. Maybe we could reduce pci.ids in d-i only to devices recognized by the kernel?

Re: Updating of pci.ids in Etch

2006-06-16 Thread Joey Hess
Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Some misc facts: > - pci.ids is currently 404k of the 660k pciutils binary package > - The pciutils udeb contains a stripped-down pci.ids file which is a mere > 236k > - pci.ids is updated regularly upstream and can be retrieved from >pciids.sf.net with a script (upd

Re: Updating of pci.ids in Etch

2006-06-16 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:37:08PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > * Matthew Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060616 20:20]: > > Some people want to update pci.ids on a regular basis. However, I think > > these people are misguided for a number of reasons. If we have a cronjob > > that goes and

Re: mozilla security bugs, NMU?

2006-06-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:58:15PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This bug is open for almost two months. As Mozilla version 1.7.13 fixes > several security bugs, please package it. If you don't have time, can I > NMU it? Please do. Nobody cares enough for mozill

Updating of pci.ids in Etch

2006-06-16 Thread Matthew Wilcox
Andi requested I forward this pair of emails to debian-release; if you wish to reply to anything in here, please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the cc as I don't read debian-release (and was sadly unaware of it, or I would have cc'd it in the first place). - Forwarded message from Matthew Wilcox <

Re: T&S 2 - Die^H^H^HRelease Harder

2006-06-16 Thread Luk Claes
Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:20:34PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Only #311188 (debian-edu-config) remained. After some discussion with >> the Debian Edu Team I started filing wishlist bugs to the packages where >> debian-edu-config would gain by having a way to change the conff

ia32-libs update for sarge

2006-06-16 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hi, I just wanted the release team now about the plans to update ia32-libs in sarge. The updates will just bring the ia64/amd64 packages back in sync with the actual i386 sarge versions. So all this (hoepfully) includes is stuff already accepted for sarge updates. For the reasons for the indivual

Re: bits from bts.turmzimmer.net

2006-06-16 Thread Andreas Barth
* Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060616 14:58]: > Le ven 16 juin 2006 14:34, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > > > I'll be happy to just filter the page locally > > > > In fact I had been doing that for a while, since I like it a bit more > > compact, and ordered per bug number instead of per package

Re: bits from bts.turmzimmer.net

2006-06-16 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le ven 16 juin 2006 14:34, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > > I'll be happy to just filter the page locally > > In fact I had been doing that for a while, since I like it a bit more > compact, and ordered per bug number instead of per package. In case > somebody else fancies it like that, these are the on

Re: bits from bts.turmzimmer.net

2006-06-16 Thread Adeodato Simó
> I'll be happy to just filter the page locally In fact I had been doing that for a while, since I like it a bit more compact, and ordered per bug number instead of per package. In case somebody else fancies it like that, these are the ones I like to look: http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/mis

Re: bits from bts.turmzimmer.net

2006-06-16 Thread Adeodato Simó
> Now, I have a couple "IMHO suggestions", let's hear what you think; I'm > not that sure about the first one, but here it goes anyway: Oh, forgot a nice one: - change the default for "newer means newer than" from 14 to 7 (as per the RC 0-day NMU policy). -- Adeodato Simó

stable update of firebird2-dev?

2006-06-16 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Hi, I am unceratin whether a particular packaging bug warrants an upload to stable. We currently have the following files in firebird2-dev/stable: usr/include/*.h usr/lib/firebird2/include/include - a symlink to /usr/include usr/share/doc/firebird2-dev/ - the usual stuff As you can see, no libX

Re: Bug#373854: libtiff-tools: DSA 1091-1 broke tiffsplit

2006-06-16 Thread Christoph Biedl
Christoph Biedl wrote... > Package: libtiff-tools > Version: 3.7.2-5 > Severity: important Let me elaborate on that. How to repeat: Use tiffsplit to split an arbitrary .tiff file: | tiffsplit foo.tif foo. This should result in a file name foo.aaa.tif (and foo.aab.tif and so on if the .tiff cont