also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.15.1832 +0200]:
> Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be willing
> to let it into the next update?
I am sorry, I accidentally replied to this as if it had come in via
a different mailing list.
--
Please do not send cop
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:20:34PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Only #311188 (debian-edu-config) remained. After some discussion with
> the Debian Edu Team I started filing wishlist bugs to the packages where
> debian-edu-config would gain by having a way to change the conffiles of
> these package aut
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:54:43PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
> > select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
> > work list.
> The l
* Steve Langasek [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:04:56 -0700]:
Hey,
> > - make "etch" and "sid" exclusive, as in, list bugs present _only_ in
> > that distribution.
> I disagree with this. I use the etch view as the (more or less, bugs not
> withstanding) authoritative view of bugs that are blockers
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:02:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Andreas Barth [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:50:12 +0200]:
> > there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
> > We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
> > bugs that have version tracking us
martin f krafft wrote:
> I tend to agree with Joey on the issue, though I do think it's not
> very nice that the postgresql security upgrade breaks other
> packages. But going via stable-proposed-updates seems like the right
> path.
>
> Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be w
* Andreas Barth [Tue, 30 May 2006 12:19:27 +0200]:
> Adeodato Simó
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=tagcoll&arch=hppa&ver=1.6.2-2&stamp=1148891155&file=log
I reproduced this on paer, started to look at it, and since it was
messy, I put it on hold and went to do some other stuff. A week la
Hi,
This bug is open for almost two months. As Mozilla version 1.7.13 fixes
several security bugs, please package it. If you don't have time, can I
NMU it?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
...
> So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
> select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
> work list.
Only #311188 (debian-edu-config) remained. After some discussion with
the Debian Edu Team I started filing wi
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:09:24PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> One of my packages (libxml-xerces-perl) has failed on m68k and arm,
In this case I'd say mailing the buildd maintainers would be the way to
go. In any case, I'm requeueing for m68k since it was a buildd timeout
and nothing wrong w
I tend to agree with Joey on the issue, though I do think it's not
very nice that the postgresql security upgrade breaks other
packages. But going via stable-proposed-updates seems like the right
path.
Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be willing
to let it into the next upda
Aargh forgot to send this yesterday. Please cc me on any replies, I'm not
subscribed to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
A question for the stable release managers.
In bug #369359, Martin Pitt also sent a patch to fix this problem for the
sarge version of Dovecot. When I mentio
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060615 14:01]:
> - make the default dist be "both" instead of "any", so that what
> people get by default is the list of bugs that must be dealt with
> before we can release.
hm, IIRC we had that case before we entered sarge's base-freeze. I
personall
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060615 12:33]:
> Good, thanks for the effort. I have just two queries here: first, since
> Debian seems to rely on this tool for the release process, wouldn't it
> make sense to move it to a debian.org host (release.debian.org comes to
> mind)?
Might be a goo
* Andreas Barth [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:50:12 +0200]:
> there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
> We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
> bugs that have version tracking used in a close message.
Cool, thanks.
> For this reason, if you do bug
Hello Andi,
> there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
> We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
> bugs that have version tracking used in a close message.
Good, thanks for the effort. I have just two queries here: first, since
Debian seems t
Hi Bill,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:00:17PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
> > select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
> > work li
* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060614 19:11]:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > One way to mitigate the problem is to propagate a fixed
> > update-grub script into a Sarge point release; here is a minimal
> > patch that should make a sarge update-grub script be
18 matches
Mail list logo
