Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> hi,
>
>> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
>> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
>
> what about the t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There seem to be 2 packages build depending on gcc-2.95: silo and
>kernel-image-2.4.27-m68k
OK, scratch that then. I haven't been checking reverse build-deps because
it's a huge pain in the neck and I can never remember how to do it.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm currently (almost done) updating cgiirc packages, I intend to adopt
>or NMU this, closing this and many other bugs.
I would like to remind you of the following statement which I made
with the first of these "easy kick-out-of-etch" messages:
>These all have RC b
On 5/11/06, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:00]:
> > One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
> > from the BTS?
>
> There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
> provide such a way.
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-11 10:00]:
> > One: What's the easiest way to extract the list of gcc-4.1 related bugs
> > from the BTS?
>
> There is none I know - I asked Martin already yesterday on IRC to
> provide such a way.
I've created the following meta bug: 366820
--
Martin
Hi Andi,
On Wednesday, 10 May 2006, you wrote:
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
to know, how other architectu
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> hi,
>
> > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for e
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 10:48]:
> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 10:09 +0200, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
> > what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> > is going to ship with 2.3?
>
> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly as
Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 10:09 +0200, Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
> what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
> is going to ship with 2.3?
An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintainer.
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:00:46AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 08:59]:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > > whether we could switch gcc to
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
hi,
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
what about the transition to python 2.4? is it going to start or etch
is go
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 08:59]:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> > freeze etch rather soon
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> freeze etch rather soon and also the RC bug count doesn't look too good,
> an
13 matches
Mail list logo
