On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:20:09AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 13:39, Sven Luther wrote:
> > maintainer, and removed my d-i commit rights, there is no way for me to
>
> I revoked your commit rights immediately after your resignation from the
> team because I felt (and I st
On Thursday 27 April 2006 13:39, Sven Luther wrote:
> maintainer, and removed my d-i commit rights, there is no way for me to
I revoked your commit rights immediately after your resignation from the
team because I felt (and I still do) that things had deteriorated so much
that the d-i team was b
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> A combination of a working patch in the most current point release,
>> documentation in the etch release notes and a conflict with the current
>> package in sarge might however do the tric
* Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060428 22:50]:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > A combination of a working patch in the most current point release,
> > documentation in the etch release notes and a conflict with the current
> > package in sarge might however
* Thiemo Seufer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060430 02:21]:
> The most important reason for a installer kernel update is IMHO to keep
> the installer useful for modern hardware.
That would however mean we're need to go to 2.6.12 or later - and I
think that's not possible. (If someone cluefully enough agre
"SM" == Sven Mueller writes:
>> just a note that the cyrus22-common package from
>> http://incase.de/cyrus22/i386/ also depends on libsnmp4.2
SM> You realize that those are outdated by a number of uploads to
SM> Debian?
thank you - i've switched to the official cyrus-*-2.2 packages.
Best,
v
6 matches
Mail list logo
