Re: sarge upgrade - linux, grub conflict

2006-04-28 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > A combination of a working patch in the most current point release, > documentation in the etch release notes and a conflict with the current > package in sarge might however do the trick. Dear grub maintainers Can you please prepar

Re: [D-I] Preparing for update in stable

2006-04-28 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:40:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 28 April 2006 11:28, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > If they do need to be in the Packages files too (so, multiple entries > > in the same Packages file with the exact same package name), we need > > some dak changes, and it's

Re: Bug#355641: Getting rid of ucd-snmp (libsnmp4.2)

2006-04-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:33:45PM +0400, Vladimir Volovich wrote: > JF> Currently, cheops is the only app still using this ancient SNMP > JF> library (at least on i386, cheops uses libsnmp9 on all other > JF> archs and in Ubuntu, as well). I'd really prefer to switch cheops > JF> to libsnmp9

Re: Getting rid of ucd-snmp (libsnmp4.2)

2006-04-28 Thread Vladimir Volovich
Hi! JF> Currently, cheops is the only app still using this ancient SNMP JF> library (at least on i386, cheops uses libsnmp9 on all other JF> archs and in Ubuntu, as well). I'd really prefer to switch cheops JF> to libsnmp9 for i386, as well and let libsnmp4.2 die its greatful JF> death and re

Re: [D-I] Preparing for update in stable

2006-04-28 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 28 April 2006 11:28, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > If they do need to be in the Packages files too (so, multiple entries > in the same Packages file with the exact same package name), we need > some dak changes, and it's a bit risky, because dak assumes at various > places that the (pack

Re: [D-I] Preparing for update in stable

2006-04-28 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060428 11:29]: > If they do need to be in the Packages files too (so, multiple entries in > the same Packages file with the exact same package name), we need some > dak changes, and it's a bit risky, because dak assumes at various places > that the (pack

Re: [D-I] Preparing for update in stable

2006-04-28 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:39:24AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Andreas Barth wrote: > > > The main problem is going to be testing the new images as it will not be > > > possible to run an installation and download kernel udebs from s-p-u and > > > other udebs from stable. > > > > The question

Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#363918: Package needs to be rebuilt against new version of libxrender-dev. Cannot build KphotoAlbum against it.

2006-04-28 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2006-04-26, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following packages have I not yet tried building in my pbuilder: > kdeedu > koffice During my sleep, these also build fine. They also look binNMU safe. > > and kdebindings seems to ftbfs for me, but I will look a bit into it > before ev