Re: Please hint loop-aes-utils 2.12r-6

2006-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:28:02PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote: > please hint loop-aes-utils 2.12r-6 to enter testing when it's > old enough. It's frozen due to a udeb that is not used in > debian-installer. Hint added. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a

Re: Allow some packages that produce udebs to migrate

2006-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 01:58:29AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > (started on IRC, but as the list grew longer...) > The following packages have been in unstable for a while and could be > hinted into testing: > unblock cdebconf/0.3.11 (25 days; not used by d-i) > unblock openssh/1:4.2p1-7 (22 days) >

Re: GCC 4.1 in experimental / GCC for etch

2006-03-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-21 02:44]: > - uploading GCC 4.1 to unstable for those architectures which do not > have ABI problems (these should be all, but should be validated). I just checked ARM using the extract-syms.sh script and it looks fine. -- Martin Michlmayr http://w

Allow some packages that produce udebs to migrate

2006-03-23 Thread Frans Pop
(started on IRC, but as the list grew longer...) The following packages have been in unstable for a while and could be hinted into testing: unblock cdebconf/0.3.11 (25 days; not used by d-i) unblock openssh/1:4.2p1-7 (22 days) unblock modutils/2.4.27.0-5 (17 days) unblock util-linux/2.12r-8 (27 d

Re: Problem with latest security version of tar (1.14-2.1)

2006-03-23 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:44:11PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hello Bdale, > > A user reported that the last security version of tar (1.14.2-1) broke > some features. > > Please take a look on for details: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2006/03/msg00170.html > > We would like to in

Problem with latest security version of tar (1.14-2.1)

2006-03-23 Thread Julien Danjou
Hello Bdale, A user reported that the last security version of tar (1.14.2-1) broke some features. Please take a look on for details: http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2006/03/msg00170.html We would like to include this package in the next stable release, but are considering this as RC for

Re: Accepted perl 5.8.4-8sarge4 (source sparc all)

2006-03-23 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Brendan, > Changes: > perl (5.8.4-8sarge4) stable; urgency=low > . >* Don't generate broken md5sums for libperl5.8 (closes: #354466). >* Preserve timestamps in /usr/share/doc. >* Fix problem with utf8/taint interaction (thanks to Steinar > Gunderson for analysis/patch). > .

Re: Please allow gnome-panel and meta-gnome2 into testing together

2006-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:22:40PM +0100, Adriaan Peeters wrote: > There is a circular dependency between gnome-panel and meta-gnome2, > but they have no other blocking dependencies. So can they please be > pushed into testing together? That would allow a few other packages > to go in as wel

Re: Accepted glibc 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-23 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Aurelien, > > Done in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge2. > > When do you expect this version will reach Sarge? > We release Debian Sarge r2 when it's ready. Greetings Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please allow gnome-panel and meta-gnome2 into testing together

2006-03-23 Thread Adriaan Peeters
Hello, There is a circular dependency between gnome-panel and meta-gnome2, but they have no other blocking dependencies. So can they please be pushed into testing together? That would allow a few other packages to go in as well. Thanks in advance, Adriaan Peeters -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Please hint loop-aes-utils 2.12r-6

2006-03-23 Thread Max Vozeler
Hi release managers, please hint loop-aes-utils 2.12r-6 to enter testing when it's old enough. It's frozen due to a udeb that is not used in debian-installer. cheers, Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Accepted glibc 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-23 Thread Andreas Barth
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060323 18:12]: > Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : > >Hi Aurelien, > > > >>Changes: > >>glibc (2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1) stable; urgency=low > >>. > >> * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>. > >> - debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update to tzdata2

Re: Accepted glibc 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Martin Zobel-Helas a écrit : Hi Aurelien, Changes: glibc (2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1) stable; urgency=low . * Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . - debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update to tzdata2006b. Could you please reupload and include a fix for #314408 [1]. This has bee

Security updated versions in sid and amd64

2006-03-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Dear release team, please consider binNMUing the packages (list below) for amd64 to avoid different packages with the same version to exists on the debian archives. Hi, as you might know amd64 has been added to the Debian archive. For this Ftp-Master insisted on rebuilding every package of the

Re: Accepted glibc 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1 (source i386 all)

2006-03-23 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Aurelien, > Changes: > glibc (2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1) stable; urgency=low > . >* Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > - debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update to tzdata2006b. Could you please reupload and include a fix for #314408 [1]. This has been discussed[2] on

Re: binNMUs for tagcoll, debtags and libapt-front

2006-03-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 05:34:26PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:44:09PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > Superfantastically weird: I thought I deinstalled gcc 4.1 before > > > building the packages. Maybe I have some stray library hanging > > > around... > > That's why