Re: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-24 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:16:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > [cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please > let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.] Yes, I do - thanks. > Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, w

Re: [stable-proposed-update] backup-manager "stable" version

2005-12-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Backup Manager 0.6 (stable version) was released[1] a couple of days > ago. This version has a better shape than the one in sarge and is much > more useful (more features). > A lot of users asked me if it was possible to backport "officially" > backup-

[stable-proposed-update] backup-manager "stable" version

2005-12-24 Thread Alexis Sukrieh
Hello, Backup Manager 0.6 (stable version) was released[1] a couple of days ago. This version has a better shape than the one in sarge and is much more useful (more features). A lot of users asked me if it was possible to backport "officially" backup-manager 0.6 to sarge. The dependencies are ve

Re: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-24 Thread Steve Langasek
[cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.] Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, which is affecting builds of most Qt-related packages on hppa today? I had suggested to LaM

Re: Possible hints etc. for KDE progression to testing

2005-12-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:56:50PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > # These are made uninstallable by the KDE hint, and they have no significant > # reverse depends. > # Bug #343037 > remove libbonobomm1.3/1.3.8-3 > # Depends on libbonobomm1.3 > remove libbonobouimm1.3/1.3.7-4 343047 looks like a

Re: kdegraphics vs. hppa

2005-12-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 01:54:48PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The latest kdegraphics failed to build on HPPA for reasons which are > clearly nothing to do with it: [...] > Anyway, kdegraphics built everywhere else. > This might be a transient buildd problem, or a bug in tetex-base. > I hope

Re: nbd upload urgency

2005-12-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 12:31:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I uploaded nbd 1:2.8.3-1 earlier, but forgot to properly set the urgency > of that upload to "high" (it contains a fix for CVE-2005-3534). Could > you guys please fix that? Yes, urgency bumped. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek