Re: Xorg 6.9

2005-12-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Kevin B McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On the same note, here is a list of source packages containing one or > more binary packages that Depend: xlibs-dev. I've already removed > packages from the list that give it as an alternative (e.g. Depends: > libx11-dev | xlibs-dev). > Debian QA Gr

Re: Xorg 6.9

2005-12-19 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
On the same note, here is a list of source packages containing one or more binary packages that Depend: xlibs-dev. I've already removed packages from the list that give it as an alternative (e.g. Depends: libx11-dev | xlibs-dev). I'll add this list to http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev shortl

Re: should packages begin using /srv ?

2005-12-19 Thread Roger Leigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one time, at band camp, Holger Levsen said: >> > So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What is >> > the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented on IRC >>

Re: Bug#338435: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...

2005-12-19 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:32:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > 04:24 < vorlon> hey all. Where are we on being able to close bug #338435? > > 04:25 < vorlon> it turns out KDE needs ocaml to be pushed first, because > > abiword-p

Re: status of the ocaml 3.09.0 migration ...

2005-12-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > 04:24 < vorlon> hey all. Where are we on being able to close bug #338435? > 04:25 < vorlon> it turns out KDE needs ocaml to be pushed first, because > abiword-plugins uses gtkmathview and abiword and koffice both depend on > libwpd. >

Re: should packages begin using /srv ?

2005-12-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Friday 09 December 2005 16:07, Holger Levsen wrote: > > policy currently mandates FHS 2.1, while FHS 2.3 is the current upstream > > version. /srv is not mentioned in FHS 2.1 - but /srv is created by > > base-files or debootstrap

Re: should packages begin using /srv ?

2005-12-19 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Monday, 19 December 2005 01:50, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Holger Levsen said: > > > So my question is simply: should packages begin using /srv now ? What > > > is the release teams opinion and decission on this ? (Steve commented > > > on IRC that it would be good to hav