On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 15:12 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:51:18AM -0500, Steve Halasz wrote:
>
> > I believe qgis needs a BinNMU for bug 339254.
>
> A binNMU is not going to change the package name, which is what that bug
> requests.
>
> Apparently, there was no packa
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:51:18AM -0500, Steve Halasz wrote:
> I believe qgis needs a BinNMU for bug 339254.
A binNMU is not going to change the package name, which is what that bug
requests.
Apparently, there was no package name change for the *previous* C++ ABI
change either. This is very pr
Hi,
I believe qgis needs a BinNMU for bug 339254.
Thanks,
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So it was suggested that openscenegraph wouldn't need to be renamed and
could be binNMUed (bug #339243). This will break certain unstable->unstable
partial upgrades; is this considered OK?
osgcal depends on openscenegraph: as of the latest rebuild,
libosgcal0 depends on libopenscenegraph1c2 (>= 0
I think it's wrong to add conflicts to libstdc++6. we'll end up with
an unmanagable long list of conflicts. can the conflict be added to
some basic gtk package instead?
Peter Moulder writes:
> Package: libstdc++6
> Version: 4.0.2-5
> Severity: important
>
>
> Upgrading libstdc++6 from 4.0.2-2 to
A fixed version of make has been uploaded; as this was already fixed in make
upstream CVS, I think the conclusion is that this is not a cdbs bug, just a
make one. Closing the bugs on cdbs accordingly.
Also closing the bugs on digikam and licq, which have already been
requeued for binNMUs with the
Steve Langasek wrote:
Thanks for the added info!
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:50:50AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It's a bit soon to declare that there's "no progress" on the hppa bugs, I
> think; AFAIK this bug *was* fixed once (KDE packages were building), and
> then it was somehow reintro
7 matches
Mail list logo
