Re: please push iso-codes into testing

2005-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 08:41:24PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > iso-codes is held back due to being used in debian-installer. > Please push iso-codes-0.49 into testing; now that the beta has been > released. Hint added. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long eno

please push iso-codes into testing

2005-12-13 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, iso-codes is held back due to being used in debian-installer. Please push iso-codes-0.49 into testing; now that the beta has been released. Regards Alastair -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNUstep library transition

2005-12-13 Thread Hubert Chan
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:39:34 -0800, Steve Langasek said: > Just for reference, can you explain what it is that prevents the > library versions from being co-installable? I would expect a > mass-rebuild anyway, but it sends up warning flags for me to hear that > partial upgrades won't work. :) Th

Re: Bug#342492: digikam: needs rebuild against latest libraries

2005-12-13 Thread Mark Purcell
reopen 342492 severity 342492 serious merge 342492 343135 block 342492 by 342879 block 343135 by 342879 thanks >> Could you please reschedule a binNMU for digikam on i386, it seems to > > Scheduled for i386, hppa, and arm. Thanks Steve, Unfortunatly we are now blocked by the make bug which is ef

Re: GNUstep library transition

2005-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Hubert, On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 11:17:57PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote: > It looks like we are just about ready to transition the GNUstep packages > to use the new GNUstep libraries. Due to the filesystem changes that we > had to make to get GNUstep (more) compliant with the FHS (see > debian-po

Re: BinNMU qterm

2005-12-13 Thread LI Daobing
On 12/13/05, LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:12:42PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > > > > > I am the maintainer of qterm. > > > > > since libarts1c2a is ready on all arch, please binNMU qterm on > > > arm,i386

Re: BinNMU qterm

2005-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 06:47:23PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > On 12/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:12:42PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > > > I am the maintainer of qterm. > > > since libarts1c2a is ready on all arch, please binNMU qterm on > > > arm,i

Re: BinNMU qterm

2005-12-13 Thread LI Daobing
On 12/13/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:12:42PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > > > I am the maintainer of qterm. > > > since libarts1c2a is ready on all arch, please binNMU qterm on > > arm,i386,ia64,m68k,mips,mipsel,s390,sparc, Thanks. > > It can't be until

Re: BinNMU qterm

2005-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:12:42PM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: > I am the maintainer of qterm. > since libarts1c2a is ready on all arch, please binNMU qterm on > arm,i386,ia64,m68k,mips,mipsel,s390,sparc, Thanks. It can't be until the newest gcc is installed on all buildds. For a quicker fix, plea

Re: Please hint maxdb-7.5.00 into testing

2005-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Martin Kittel wrote: > Hello release team, > could you please hint maxdb-7.5.00 along with libdbd-maxdb-perl and > php4-maxdb into testing? Currently they are stuck in unstable because > migrating maxdb-7.5.00 is making the previous versions of > libdbd

BinNMU qterm

2005-12-13 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, I am the maintainer of qterm. since libarts1c2a is ready on all arch, please binNMU qterm on arm,i386,ia64,m68k,mips,mipsel,s390,sparc, Thanks. -- LI Daobing