Re: f-prot-installer needs update in stable again

Johannes Rohr wrote: > Dear release team, > > unfortunately the f-prot-installer package is again broken by upstream > changes. The release of f-prot 4.6.2 includes a modification of the > check-updates.pl script incompatible with the installer script in the > package. Therefore I would like to as

Re: mpich C++ translation: Ready to go!

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:20:29PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:50 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 13:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 04:40:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > FWIW, we're very close now to

Re: mpich C++ translation: Ready to go!

On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:50 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 13:51 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 04:40:31AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > FWIW, we're very close now to being able to get everything into testing. > > > The remaining blockers ar

Re: Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:06:26PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Can you please let 3.0.3-5 into testing? Hint added. Thanks, - -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set

Re: consider allowing mozilla in

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:32:58PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Mozilla has two RC bugs, but they're both present in the version in 'testing' > already. Might as well unclog spidermonkey, epiphany-browser, etc. > force mozilla/2:1.7.12-1 Added.

Re: Suggest removing or binNMUing llvm

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:03:58AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > llvm was compiled with g++ 3.3 on i386, g++-4.0 everywhere else (bug > #330638). As such it is sort of an ugly annoyance in the C++ transition. > Perhaps a binNMU, or a removal, is appropriate. This mismatch is present > in testi

Re: maxdb hint

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 11:53:20PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I'm so pleased, I found an easy one. > # Bug #334843 > remove php4-maxdb/7.5.00.30-1 > easy maxdb-7.5.00/7.5.00.30-3 libdbd-maxdb-perl/7.5.00.32-1 Bug #334823 only applies to the version in unstable, so is not by itself a reason

Re: how to ask for a binNMU?

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:40:57PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > fvwm needs a binNMU on ARM for its own sake; it shouldn't be waiting for > libpng, but it is, becaue one of the ARM autobuilders had an old version > of libpng12-dev hanging around. > How does one suggest such a thing? Asking on

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-24 23:59]: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > > but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above? > > > These > > > pac

Re: mpich C++ transition status

* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-24 23:59]: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > but shouldn't octave-forge and octaviz be included in the list above? These > > packages are not currently in testing. > > Because they're not in testing, they don't

Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

Hi, Can you please let 3.0.3-5 into testing? Thanks Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mpich C++ transition status

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-11 19:22]: > > Here is the current status of the mpich/hdf5/lam migration. > > The following are uploaded, but some have build problems: > > Source: blacs-mpi > > Source: hdf5 > > So