Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Nathanael Nerode:
>
>
>>Note the following apparent facts:
>>* libssl0.9.7 and libssl0.9.8, if linked in the same binary, will cause
>>unpredictable failure due to symbol conflicts.
>>* This could be fixed if libssl0.9.8 had versioned symbols, which it doesn't
>>yet.
>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:44:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> So the two different versions of sidplay are tied together due
> to xmms-sid. xsidplay ties libsidplay to arts and Qt,
> while gst-plugins0.8 ties it to arts, flac -- and liboil, which is
> FTBFS on powerpc.
> remove gst-plugins
So the two different versions of sidplay are tied together due
to xmms-sid. xsidplay ties libsidplay to arts and Qt,
while gst-plugins0.8 ties it to arts, flac -- and liboil, which is
FTBFS on powerpc.
remove gst-plugins0.8/0.8.8-3
remove xsidplay/1.6.5.2-2
easy libsidplay/1.36.59-4, mp3blaster/
Hello Mark and Thomas,
Mark Purcell schrieb:
> My one query is Does kmymoney2 build with kbanking from aqbanking? Do you
> have
> some test debs I can look into?
The packages I've build and checked in to svn.debian.org are available
under http://aqbanking.alioth.debian.org/unstable/
>>So I'd l
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 06:12:32PM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying
> > gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking
> > introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev)
> > is disruptive to the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:53:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But there seems to be a *huge* pile-up of libraries preventing that from
> > happening today. I didn't realize how big it was until I looked at
> > gnucash's status just now.
> T
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:14:19PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> One removal should likewise get wxwindows in:
>
>> # Don't wait for subversion
>> remove rapidsvn/0.8.0-3
>
> That's not one removal, because pysvn also depends on rapidsvn.
Ah, two. :-P
> I don't
> s
Can't seem to find any mirrors: I have found heaps of jigdo files from
< sarge, but none for current sid. It seems fsn://HU is not creating
files for some reason. All the mirrors have out of date images (some
from March, some from March 2001...). Is anyone willing to create a
new mirror with curren
What is different about debian 3.1r0 and r1 r2 through r6? I do not know whether to get r0 or something else because I do not know the difference. What is the difference between those and Debian Sarge?
I want to download DVD iso images for Debian unstable / sid. Las time I
did that I used jigdo. .jigdo files were at:
ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial/sid-dvd/jigdo/
but now I can not find them anywhere. I was searching for a few days
now, but no luck. Debian users mailing list
On Thursday 20 October 2005 08:50, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> first, my apologies for not following up on the Mark's ITP which I
> overlooked...
I became aware after I had built kbanking, also I wasn't aware how soon the
aqbanking direct support for kbanking was going to be, so I uploaded
kbanking
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051020 16:54]:
> Something about our buildd methodology forces this pain. One example
> is that with a chain of dependent packages, each package gets built,
> then in a day or so the buildd admin signs it and uploads it, and the
> next day it is added to
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:02:58PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Due to the way how buildd works, it sometimes happens that packages slip
> through the cracks and get lost. If that happens, usually all you need
> to do is contact the buildd admin. Have you tried that? (i.e.,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:46:04AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > You can browse the build logs on buildd.debian.org.
>
> I did. It says mpich was build (probably succesful) 2 months ago. It
> does not tell me why it still hasn
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051020 17:19]:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > You can browse the build logs on buildd.debian.org.
>
> I did. It says mpich was build (probably succesful) 2 months ago. It
> does not tell me why it still hasn't entered
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:00:16AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> That's odd, my mirror has the latest arm binary .debs for mpich and lam,
> and they appear to have been there for quite a while...
Maybe I have to check my sources.list then. That seems weird.
I will try redoing my /etc/apt dire
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 03:44:10PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> You can browse the build logs on buildd.debian.org.
I did. It says mpich was build (probably succesful) 2 months ago. It
does not tell me why it still hasn't entered unstable 2 months later.
That is what I was wondering about.
Is
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 07:53:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Something about our buildd methodology forces this pain. One example
> is that with a chain of dependent packages, each package gets built,
> then in a day or so the buildd admin signs it and uploads it, and the
> next day it
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But there seems to be a *huge* pile-up of libraries preventing that from
> happening today. I didn't realize how big it was until I looked at
> gnucash's status just now.
The autobuilders are puttering along. Hence my email recently to
debian-devel a
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 09:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:37:17PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Can someone please build scalapack for arm? I tried (took about 20
> > hours on my netwinder), but am still bitten by bug 222536 -- which is
> > not reproducible, exce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
At Tue, 18 Oct 2005 23:37:17 -0400,
Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Can someone please build scalapack for arm? I tried (took about 20
> hours on my netwinder), but am still bitten by bug 222536 -- which is
> not reproducible, except on my box where it
The attachment(s) that you sent with the following mail
was deleted by VisNetic MailScan (not delivered to the recipient)
==
The Mail came from: debian-release@lists.debian.org
The Mail recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject of the Mail
* Lennart Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051020 15:10]:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:37:17PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Can someone please build scalapack for arm? I tried (took about 20
> > hours on my netwinder), but am still bitten by bug 222536 -- which is
> > not reproducible, except o
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:37:17PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Can someone please build scalapack for arm? I tried (took about 20
> hours on my netwinder), but am still bitten by bug 222536 -- which is
> not reproducible, except on my box where it always happens. :-(
>
> Since I just built o
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 10:32:09AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-05 01:28]:
> > > octave-gpc needs a requeue (and I think that's all) on alpha and
> > > mips, as it couldn't find libgpcl-dev and that package now appears to
> > > be available. I'm
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:19:47PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Right, and for that reason I'm not going to spend too much time chasing my
> > tail on this right now given that a lot can change between now and
> > openssl/GNOME1 being ready.
>
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-05 01:28]:
> > octave-gpc needs a requeue (and I think that's all) on alpha and
> > mips, as it couldn't find libgpcl-dev and that package now appears to
> > be available. I'm not sure what's going on with it on ia64; it
> > installs libgpcl-dev and th
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:02:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying
> > gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking
> > introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - Release team: kmymoney2 has already been mentioned to be tying
> gnucash to kde. Is my impression that an update of libaqbanking
> introducing libkbanking1 (and a build-dependency on kdelibs4-dev)
> is disruptive to the testing migration?
Thom
Hi Mark, Micha, Release gurus,
first, my apologies for not following up on the Mark's ITP which I
overlooked...
As you may or may not know, the kbanking library as introduced to
Debian/unstable in October is obsolete and is probably (on the way to
being) at least partially unusable since about Au
30 matches
Mail list logo
