Re: orbit2cpp

2005-09-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:53:35PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Bradley Bell appears to be missing in action. Or on vacation. > orbit2cpp has only the unused libbonobomm1.3 and libbonobouimm1.3 > as reverse depends. It currently has a nasty misbuilt version on ARM, > and doesn't build proper

Re: requalification of debian/hppa for etch

2005-09-23 Thread Joel Soete
Joel Soete wrote: [...] And I just recover access to my test boxes (about 7, not tacken account 3 chroot disk fully operational install :_( ) appologies: only 6 hppa, the 7th debian is an unstable i386 (actualy a hp vectra; mainly the serial console for some other pa boxes. Sorry f

orbit2cpp

2005-09-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Bradley Bell appears to be missing in action. orbit2cpp has only the unused libbonobomm1.3 and libbonobouimm1.3 as reverse depends. It currently has a nasty misbuilt version on ARM, and doesn't build properly on ARM due to a GCC bug. Perhaps these should all be dropped from unstable. But they s

oo2c and friends

2005-09-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
So, I'm going to suggest that oo2c, libooc-vo, libooc-x11, and libooc-xml be removed from testing (bug #329791, FTBFS on powerpc). They can return immediately as soon as oo2c is fixed so that it works on powerpc. I'm actually rather suspicious that oo2c is not being properly maintained, due to a

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:38:30PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > In linux.debian.devel.release Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > >ICE b

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > > >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which is an at least as > > >serious

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > in recent weeks from the global point of view m68k has started to hold > up the testing migration due to both lacking buildd power and internal > compiler errors. As of the most recent britney run, the number of > missing bu

Re: requalification of debian/hppa for etch

2005-09-23 Thread Joel Soete
Grant Grundler wrote: [...] And install popularity-contest already. sheesh. No kidding. There are 250+ people subcribed to debian-hppa list: http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-hppa.png You'd think that more than 31 of them had a parisc-linux box running: http://popcon.