Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm confused; libgal2.4{,-dev} are in unstable now, and don't conflict with
> libgal{,-dev}, needed by gnucash, gpredict etc. Hence there doesn't seem
> to be any particular need to remove the old version.
No. We've sorted it out. All that is happeni
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:16:08PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Takuo Kitame has told me that the "gal" package will suddenly become
> the 2.x version of gal, instead of the 0.x version which it has always
> been until now. This seems to me to be a needless churning of package
> names and f
Takuo Kitame has told me that the "gal" package will suddenly become
the 2.x version of gal, instead of the 0.x version which it has always
been until now. This seems to me to be a needless churning of package
names and filenames.
It also causes me pain; gnucash needs the Gnome 1 gal. I'm happy
I have a new address: 408 Kernan Ave, Frankfort, NY 13340. please update, thank you so much.p
Hi,
GSM 2.8.1-5 is in TPU but testing and unstable have higher versions
now, can someone please kick it out or confirm that no action is
needed?
Thanks,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Come, your destiny awaits!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
5 matches
Mail list logo
