Re: cln is scheduled for removal?

2005-09-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:41:47PM +0200, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > According to [0], cln is scheduled for removal. This is a refreshing new > twist: to remove a package once all critical bugs have been fixed! Well, I'm apparently no good at transcribing package version numbers anyway, so cln w

Re: cln is scheduled for removal?

2005-09-06 Thread Andreas Barth
* Richard B. Kreckel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050906 21:57]: > According to [0], cln is scheduled for removal. This is a refreshing new > twist: to remove a package once all critical bugs have been fixed! > > Please, can someone confirm that this is some piece of disinformation? The package is not y

cln is scheduled for removal?

2005-09-06 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
Hi, According to [0], cln is scheduled for removal. This is a refreshing new twist: to remove a package once all critical bugs have been fixed! Please, can someone confirm that this is some piece of disinformation? shocked -richy. [0] --