On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:15:16PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> For modules, you need to know what you are doing. Unfortunately the
> kernel developers seem to be ignorant WRT such things, "gcc" is
> hardcoded in assumption of beeing a never changing compatibility
> constant.
Perhaps you could en
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:16:27PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:23:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > >
> > I also don't understand why the gcc version is an issue. I mean, you
> > can compile a library with one version of gcc and link to it when
> > compiling a progr
#include
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Tue, Aug 30 2005, 01:06:39AM]:
> > Why?
> >
> Becuase I roll my own kernel. If I upgrade the kernel with gcc-3.3
> (currently the Sarge default) and then upgrade to Etch (which will have
> gcc-4.0 for a default) I will run into problems if I decide to add new
> mod
On Aug 31, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is where these threads usually end...
> With one of your terse one-liners?
With none of the complainers actually being useful to provide a better
solution.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
4 matches
Mail list logo
