Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] Re: GNUstep and FHS

2005-07-29 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Hubert Chan a écrit : >On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:48:38 +0300, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think it would be very hard to get /usr/GNUstep added to FHS. > > > /usr/OpenStep ? >For some strange reason, -policy seems to be rather quiet on this issue >this time around. There

Re: GNUstep and FHS

2005-07-29 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:19:30PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote: > /usr/X11R6 is specified specifically as an option in FHS and was > basically grandfathered in. And it seems Branden thinks that it will > eventually disappear (or at least be replaced by symlinks). > http://lists.debian.org/debian-deve

Re: GNUstep and FHS

2005-07-29 Thread Hubert Chan
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:48:38 +0300, Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:52:48AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: >> * Ask the RMs/QA for an exception due to GNUstep's nature > There is already a precedent in FHS - the /usr/lib/X11R6 directory. > GNUstep is not a dif

Re: [Debian GNUstep maintainers] GNUstep and FHS

2005-07-29 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:52:48AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > * Ask the RMs/QA for an exception due to GNUstep's nature There is already a precedent in FHS - the /usr/lib/X11R6 directory. GNUstep is not a different case, just a less important one. For now. > (I am CC-ing Anton Zinoviev, w