On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:34:34PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
> Why not ship SARGE with unrar-nonfree and provide a
[...]
> Maybe in ETCH.
[...]
> SARGE $USER are using now "unrar-nonfree" and in
[...]
> ETCH we can remove the virtual-package "unrar".
[...]
It's Sarge, and Etch. Please d
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 12:42:30AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Potential bugs: IMHO not in the parts I worked on (I have adopted the
> > > package). The experimental features are disabled by default, disabled in
> > > a non-invasive way. The people need to run an upgrade script once but
> > >
Hi folks,
Thanks to some fancy last-minute archive work by James Troup, we now have a
solution that lets us get security-fixed kernels into sarge r0 (instead of
just into security.d.o) without running into GPL problems with
debian-installer.
The one remaining restriction is that no updates are al
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:37:07AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>>>Anibal said:
>(...)
>>>Javier pushed -10 as an important security improvement for desktop/laptop
>>>systems and I agree with him on that regard. Running portmap listening
>>>to the world on a desktop/laptop system is
On 28 May 2005 at 23:53, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
| If you want it to be maintained for another full release cycle, and
| think it's worth it, sure -- but it's a bit unclear to me what you mean.
Ggobi replaces xgobi. Ggobi didn't make it into sarge, but then xgobi isn't
in it either (non-free
On May 28, 2005 15:47, Bill Allombert wrote:
> After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
> but also the following:
>
> 1) debootstrap woody
>
> 2) Install the following packages:
> konqueror aptitude libqt3 libhtml-tree-perl libapt-pkg-perl libft-perl
>
> 3) point apt
Hello,
Please consider bzip2 1.0.2-7 for sarge. It fixes security vulnerability
CAN-2005-1260, RC bug #310803, and #293581.
Closes: 293581 310803
Changes:
bzip2 (1.0.2-7) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Fixed "CAN-2005-1260 decompression bomb vulnerability", closes: #310803.
Patch by Martin
> > Anibal said:
(...)
> > Javier pushed -10 as an important security improvement for desktop/laptop
> > systems and I agree with him on that regard. Running portmap listening
> > to the world on a desktop/laptop system is a considerable security
> > risk.
Please note that I didn't push this patch
Bill Allombert wrote:
> After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
> but also the following:
>
> 1) debootstrap woody
>
> 2) Install the following packages:
> konqueror aptitude libqt3 libhtml-tree-perl libapt-pkg-perl libft-perl
>
> 3) point apt at sarge.
>
> At t
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Bill,
> > I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
> After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
> but
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490.
> > > This show a pure woody system that cann
If you want it to be maintained for another full release cycle, and
think it's worth it, sure -- but it's a bit unclear to me what you mean.
Either it's removed from unstable only, and after the release, or it's
removed from sarge too. It'll stay in woody unless there's some legal
reason not to.
E
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 10:44:17PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Would you accept menu 2.1.24 to sarge ? It is built on all architectures.
> It is a documentation fix/translation update-only upload.
Yep, approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Hi Dave,
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:39:03PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> It's 8 days old now so I guess in 2 days it'll be in testing
> however it fixes RC bug on libpixman 309674 and indirectly helps
> fix separate grave bug on oregano 309645 which needed it's own patch,
> now done.
"important"
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:27:08PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> ntlmaps 0.9.9-2 has been uploaded to unstable.
> I recommend it for sarge, the only change is a new Czech translation
> (bug #309081).
> It's arch-all (python script) so no further buildd building is required.
Approved.
Thanks,
--
Dear Debian Release Team,
Would you accept menu 2.1.24 to sarge ? It is built on all architectures.
It is a documentation fix/translation update-only upload.
menu (2.1.24) unstable; urgency=medium
* The "head or tail" release
* Fix .menus typo in menufile.5. Closes: #306564. Thanks Sean Finn
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> I don't suppose there's a smaller test case involving fewer packages?
After spending a dozen of hour tracking it, I have the obvious headache,
but also the following:
1) debootstrap woody
2) Install the following pac
It's 8 days old now so I guess in 2 days it'll be in testing
however it fixes RC bug on libpixman 309674 and indirectly helps
fix separate grave bug on oregano 309645 which needed it's own patch,
now done.
The sole change in 0.1.4-2 is the patch for the bug fix.
My preference is still to remove t
I know you're getting a lot requests, and I really don't want
to add too much to the workload, but if you would please consider
accepting LLVM 1.4-4 into sarge, I would greatly appreciate it.
LLVM 1.4-3 fixed two RC bugs:
-- #304035: a naming conflict with the 'extract' package
-- #308694:
Dear translators,
The release has been postponed by one week and is now planned for the
weekend of June 4/5.
!!! This means that the deadline for translations is: Thursday June 2. !!!
The last planned changes have now been committed, together with some minor
improvements. We are very sorry we'v
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:45:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think I would prefer an upload to t-p-u for this.
Okay. I suspected as much, but as the unstable version already exists
(and I understood from the gossip that t-p-u isn't completely void of
problems), I wanted to ask first.
> The
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:49:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 01:03:13AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I need to attract your attention on bug #310490.
>
> > This show a pure woody system that cannot be upgraded to sarge
> > using the recommended way witout basically
( please honour the explicite set 'Reply-To:' )
Hello Release Team,
The text below is from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about a Request For Sponsoring.
My questions are at the bottom.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:25:11AM -0500, Reed Snellenberger wrote:
> Geert Stappers wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 0
Dear RMs,
There are some package that need attention:
1) Please remove metalog from Sarge; I am the
maintaner of it, and do not feel that it is
mature enough for the release.
2) Please let neon enter Sarge as it contains only
changes to control, copyright and changelog expect
an one li
Am 2005-05-22 14:36:50, schrieb Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> My rationale to do this, is:
>
> - woody shipped with a non-free unrar named 'unrar', and it worked
OK.
> - the free version is not functionally equivalent yet, of the .rar files
> in the wild, I couldn't actually find a single one that
ntlmaps 0.9.9-2 has been uploaded to unstable.
I recommend it for sarge, the only change is a new Czech translation
(bug #309081).
It's arch-all (python script) so no further buildd building is required.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:17:24AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > > * babel: closes FTBFS bugs on arches where it works and adds a new
> > > package; if accepted, I'll upload 0.10.2-2 specifying build only
> > > for successful arches (i386, powerpc, sparc).
> > Er, this p
27 matches
Mail list logo
