Re: ppp and mutt

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:23:37AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Please push both to testing, ppp has already been reviewed and was > waiting for a portslave upload. ppp has previously been accepted (along with portslave and pptpd). I've approved mutt now as well. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postm

Re: glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21 into sarge (Re: arm seems OK: release status?)

On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:36:03PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > At Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:10:18 -0700, > Steve Langasek wrote: > > That, and still waiting for the glibc upload to roll in, and for > > testing-security to be 100% on-line. > I duploaded glibc 2.3.2.ds1-21. Please consider to put this

Re: Debian Sarge Snapshot - error in readme

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:11:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: >> -- >> About This CD >> = > >>This CD-ROM is labeled > >> Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official Snapshot i386 Binary-14 > >>which means that

Re: Bug#305946: Please remove linc from unstable

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 10:05:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Removed, Sebastian, will you file the RC bugs on the depending packages? > > For reference: > > battfink > cappuccino > gnome-swallow-applet > googlizer > grcm > quark Done. I will ping the maintainers who have not replied

Re: security updates missing only arm builds, etc

On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:31:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Also I suggest pushing in cernlib 2004.11.04-3, this fixes some /tmp > races and is still missing arm after 22 days. The other missing arch > finally built it. Done, of course. > BTW, a few other interesting single arch security blocker

Re: Please consider nfs-utils 1:1.0.7-3 for sarge

Anibal, As the new nfs-utils maintainer, are you aware of the concerns the krb5 maintainer raised in bug #298920? Also, do you plan to address bug #294959 at all for sarge (perhaps with Chip's suggestion of documenting the problem, for now)? Since 236435 hasn't been fixed, I'm not sure how urgen

Please push shadow-4.0.3-31sarge3 to sarge

After a -sarge2 version which failed to make it to sarge because of one of the maintainers stupidity, we rebuilt a 4.0.3-sarge3 version of the package, which l10n and documentation fixes: shadow (1:4.0.3-31sarge3) unstable; urgency=low * The "please buy me a brain" release * *Really* shorten