Re: Bug#305946: Please remove linc from unstable

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:26:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:42:03AM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote: > > Package: ftp.debian.org > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Please remove the linc source package as well as the binary packages > > liblinc1 and liblinc-dev f

Re: Bug#305946: Please remove linc from unstable

retitle 305946 RM: linc -- RoM; Included in orbit2 tags 305946 moreinfo thanks On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:42:03AM +0200, Sebastian Rittau wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Please remove the linc source package as well as the binary packages > liblinc1 and liblinc-dev from

Re: Re: exim4_4.50-6 is needed to work with libnss-ldap

Hi Marc, > The fix for the libnss-ldap issues has issues with the Installer, > which is the cause for the fix being tested _very_ thoroughly. The > installer, in my opinion, is much more important than libnss-ldap. Tested 4.50-6 with d-i by doing a floppy installation using unstable mirrors (i38

RE[4]: Rolex is what I want you to wear. quippingpyrometer

Thank you for expressing interest in Replicas watches Bazaar. We would like to take this opportunity to offer you our fine selection of Italian crafted Rolex Timepieces. You can view our large selection of Rolexes (including Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier etc) at: http://www.standardreplicas.com

Re: more security holes blocked by arm

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 12:52:36PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > These packages have security holes in testing whose fix is only blocked > by missing arm builds: > - lsh-utils 2.0.1-2.1 for CAN-2005-0389, CAN-2005-0814 > .. er, that's all actually. Hint added. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern