On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:58:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:38:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > > On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMA
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:38:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 3) Inform the user that a reboot is nee
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:20:20 +0100, jdthood wrote:
> ifupdown 0.6.4-4.12 was prepared with sarge in mind. The changes were
> limited to documentation improvements, low risk code tweaks and a
> necessary bugfix. -4.11 was uploaded two weeks ago and -4.12 was
> uploaded eleven days ago with one add
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:37:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Frank,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:44AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > Mostly translation updates and documentation fixes. The only interesti
On Mar 18, Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of this, I believe only the change of hwrandom to hwrng has the potential
> to "break" anything already existing, and I can't think of anything essential
I did the same change in udev some time ago, and nobody complained.
--
ciao,
Marco
sig
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's also waiting on a new version of makedev, which is frozen and includes
> lots of changes not related to the udev change, and has only been in
> unstable for two days. Cc:ed to the maintainer (Bdale) as well, for
> comments on whether makedev shoul
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:16:47PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:12:59PM +0200, Jonathan Quick wrote:
> > On Mar 18, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >On Mar 18, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It would be good if someone could do a co
Hi,
* Christian Hammers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050318 16:05]:
> If it eases the work of the RM or the people who check sarge's security
> via bugscan mails, you can tag #296674 and #285276 (merged) as "sarge-ignore".
Hm, the bug reports are already tagged with woody. So, at least for our
tools, th
Hello
If it eases the work of the RM or the people who check sarge's security
via bugscan mails, you can tag #296674 and #285276 (merged) as "sarge-ignore".
It's a low risk mysql vulnerability issue (CAN-2004-0956 and CAN-2004-0957)
that is already fixed in sarge/sid, has a patch and waits for th
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 04:12:59PM +0200, Jonathan Quick wrote:
> On Mar 18, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Mar 18, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> It would be good if someone could do a concrete d-i sid test with this
> >> version of udev, to confirm that it do
On Mar 18, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mar 18, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It would be good if someone could do a concrete d-i sid test with this
>> version of udev, to confirm that it does solve the problems in question.
>I know that it does, it was a trivial fi
On Mar 18, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's also waiting on a new version of makedev, which is frozen and includes
> lots of changes not related to the udev change, and has only been in
> unstable for two days. Cc:ed to the maintainer (Bdale) as well, for
> comments on whether mak
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:19:30PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> please force pppoeconf 1.3 into testing, it solves to nasty problems:
>
> - #298223: pppoeconf: setting up ppp_on_boot is depercated
> (init script from ppp spews lot of warnings)
> - #296778: wrong permissions of dsl-provider
>
Hello release team,
please force pppoeconf 1.3 into testing, it solves to nasty problems:
- #298223: pppoeconf: setting up ppp_on_boot is depercated
(init script from ppp spews lot of warnings)
- #296778: wrong permissions of dsl-provider
(follows the current relaxed policy for permissions
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 02:38:35AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > 3) Inform the user that a reboot is needed in order for it to work.
> > No, it's not! Months ago I did a l
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't know the details. I didn't call for it; it's gtkhtml that
> > did. Since there are only two packages using the library, and it's a
> > crufty old gnome-1 thing anyway, I wouldn't mind punting the upload I
> > did and uploading under the old
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:37:29PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:44AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Mostly translation updates and documentation fixes. The only interesting
> > change is probably:
> > eject.c: Don't try to eject /cdrom anymore, th
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:41:00AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> please consider pushing exim4 4.50-4 from unstable into testing. The
> package has been in sid for 10 days without any new bad bugs
> surfacing. exim4 4.50 has been in sid for some time longer since we
> hat two RC bugs in the first
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:45:06PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Can you explain what the needed change was that required an SONAME bump
> > here?
> I don't know the details. I didn't call for it; it's gtkhtml that
> did. Since there are only
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 10:36:12AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3) Inform the user that a reboot is needed in order for it to work.
> No, it's not! Months ago I did a lot of work in postinst to support
> reboot-less installation of udev.
> Th
==
(BVIRUS GUARD and CHECK SERVICE for E-Mail Powerd by SYMANTEC Scan Engine.
(B
$B$"$J$?$,Aw$C$?%a!<%k$K%&%#%k%9$rH/8+$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B8!CN$5$l$?%&[EMAIL PROTECTED];_$N0Y!"%a!<%k$r:o=|CW$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B%a!<%k$rAw?.$7$h$&[
On Mar 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) Inform the user that a reboot is needed in order for it to work.
No, it's not! Months ago I did a lot of work in postinst to support
reboot-less installation of udev.
There is not enough data in this bug report to even start investigating
it
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:18:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:36:33AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > There is no transfer needed at all, IOW the capability to do releases
> > from ports.debian.org exists (and is a very good thing, as Colin
> > Watson points out
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 05:36:33AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > All the stuff is on scc; how do we transfer it back? Will it be easy,
> > or a major obstacle?
> There is no transfer needed at all, IOW the capability to do releases
> from ports.debian.org exists (and is a very good thing,
24 matches
Mail list logo
