Hello Release Managers.
This is in reply to Andreas's comment on irc where vorlon mentioned the
mldonkey RC bug.
Given Sylvain's comment that mldonkey should not be in testing, i think this
is a green light to go ahead, i will scan the weekly RC bug list for other
issues though.
On Fri, Mar 18,
Hi Frank,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:51:44AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Mostly translation updates and documentation fixes. The only interesting
> change is probably:
> eject.c: Don't try to eject /cdrom anymore, this location is
> deprecated (support for /media was already added in -4)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:47:50AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> doc-linux 2005.02-1 (and 2005.01-1) had just the normal monthly
> changes and the latest package is now 13 days in sid. Please
> approve it for migration to testing.
Hinted.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
sig
Hi Gus,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:20:58AM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:
> I have a package (libembperl-perl) that, like many others is having
> difficulty getting (re)scheduled onto the arm buildds. This package
> is no longer in sarge, having been removed due to the bug (YA apache2 api
> change) the
I have a package (libembperl-perl) that, like many others is having
difficulty getting (re)scheduled onto the arm buildds. This package
is no longer in sarge, having been removed due to the bug (YA apache2 api
change) the new version fixes.
I've asked everyone I can think of and the response seem
|| On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:58:30 +0100
|| Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
avb> Hi,
avb> [please cc: me, I don't read -release]
avb> In postgrey^s logcheck patterns, I have a made a minor mistake (a single
avb> occasional message which is not ignored as it should be.)
avb> I feel si
[CCing debian-release; please follow-up to both lists.]
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 08:57:33AM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote:
> On balance (and not just because I have a lab full of machines with i915
> chipsets to look after), I think that we really ought to try to get this
> into sarge. It won't be lon
Ccing debian-release, for info, but after having spoken with Andres i don't
think it will be needed to investigate this for sarge.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 04:57:51PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Oh well, it is a month after i was told about it, and
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:44:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op di, 15-03-2005 te 16:19 -0500, schreef Anthony DeRobertis:
> > Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> > | You misunderstood. I don't fight generic changes to the order; I just
> > | don't think it would be a good thing that a
* Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be
> released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1
> (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in
> incoming).
I just uploaded 4.74.dfsg.2-1 which has some more
10 matches
Mail list logo
