Hi,
[please cc: me, I don't read -release]
In postgrey^s logcheck patterns, I have a made a minor mistake (a single
occasional message which is not ignored as it should be.)
I feel silly doing a new upload for a one character mistake, and wouldn't
bother normally. OTOH I'd be annoyed if that
Package: kernel-package
Version: 8.125
Severity: important
Hi Manoj, ...
I just got a bug report against my powerpc kernels which use as you know the
/etc/kernel/*.d scripts, and an installation of this kernels on a woody system
failed, because the woody runparts doesn't understand the -v option
Hi Frans,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:10:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm posting this to release as I'd like release managers' opinion on this
> before filing an RC bug (especially after noting who the maintainer
> is ;-)
> I just noticed in an upgrade of my Hercules S/390 emulator that I run
(please CC me as I'm not on the list)
I'm posting this to release as I'd like release managers' opinion on this
before filing an RC bug (especially after noting who the maintainer
is ;-)
I just noticed in an upgrade of my Hercules S/390 emulator that I run for
D-I testing, that gnupg now depen
Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I think the queue
> needs to be as FIFO as possible for fairness and "principle of least
> surprise" sake.
See my patch on d-d (also mailed to the ftpmasters), which inserts "age in
queue" (actually, timestamp of last status change, but that's
more-or-less equivalent)
Hi,
As probably some have read in -project[1], there is a possibility of
keeping track of release issues for etch using debbugs, considering that
we're close to have bug dependencies[2] in debbugs (I'll be mailing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to ask him to apply and test the patch).
The "Bits from Vancouver
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
That's not to say that a request to prioritize a package is to be
ignored; however, the power of deciding which packages get built first
should be with those that actually build the packages, rather than with
those who want their packages to be built. The former are expected
Hello Wouter
On 2005-03-16 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> That's not to say that a request to prioritize a package is to be
> ignored; however, the power of deciding which packages get built first
> should be with those that actually build the packages, rather than with
> those who want their packages t
Op di, 15-03-2005 te 16:19 -0500, schreef Anthony DeRobertis:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> | You misunderstood. I don't fight generic changes to the order; I just
> | don't think it would be a good thing that any random developer could
> | prioritize his pet package.
> |
>
> Any random developer
ifupdown 0.6.4-4.12 was prepared with sarge in mind. The changes were
limited to documentation improvements, low risk code tweaks and a
necessary bugfix. -4.11 was uploaded two weeks ago and -4.12 was
uploaded eleven days ago with one additional change. No new bugs have
been reported. Please pu
10 matches
Mail list logo
