> I think that indeed the buildd probably did not start building the
> first version (unchecked), as it was there only for 3-4 hours, so the
> real harm was probably not very high.
Well, wrong. 6 of them built the package as far sa I can see. And
indeed all of them have built the new release now.
Dear release managers,
The shadow package got a RC bug reported yesterday (299549) and I made
a high urgency upload to fix it. This was a broken woody->sarge
upgrade bug (in some situations) so it deserved of course immediate
attention.
I used this opportunity to finally and officially take over
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Upstream maintains separate stable and development branches, so the
> 2.4.5 release has received plenty of testing, and is overall just so
> much better than the 2.2 branch. Also, lilypond is a "leaf" package
> in the dependency graph, so it shoul
I've agreed to take over lilypond, the excellent music typesetting
engine.
The current Debian version is based on upstream version 2.2.6, and my
adopting upload brought it into a releasable state.
Upstream would really like me to upload the latest stable version,
however, which is 2.4.5. I am i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
| You misunderstood. I don't fight generic changes to the order; I just
| don't think it would be a good thing that any random developer could
| prioritize his pet package.
|
Any random developer already has root on X thousand deb
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Op ma, 14-03-2005 te 17:59 +0100, schreef Goswin von Brederlow:
>> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Op vr, 11-03-2005 te 19:14 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek:
>> >> The queue ordering is entirely automatic, and AIUI the queue(s) is (
6 matches
Mail list logo
