Re: selinux-enabled packages (and avr-gdb)

2005-03-14 Thread Hakan Ardo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:22:09PM +0100, Markus Schabel wrote: > > The same problem exists with simulavr, which doesn't work without avr-gdb, > which is not included in debian (however, there are packages for other > distributions available). In my opinion you should either exclude simulavr > or

Please approve lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1 for sarge

2005-03-14 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
The non-free code which was removed in 4.74.dfsg.1-1 should not be released with sarge. No new RC bugs were introduced between 4.71-1 (which is currently in sarge) and 4.74.dfsg.1-1 (which is still in incoming). Full changelog: lsof (4.74.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=high * Removed non-free "un

Re: gtkhtml soname change

2005-03-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can you explain what the needed change was that required an SONAME bump > here? I don't know the details. I didn't call for it; it's gtkhtml that did. Since there are only two packages using the library, and it's a crufty old gnome-1 thing anyway, I

gtkhtml soname change

2005-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Thomas, On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:28:01PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just so you know ahead of time. I've been told by other QA people I > > should go ahead and take over gtkhtml (the ancient version of the > > library), which need

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just so you know ahead of time. I've been told by other QA people I > should go ahead and take over gtkhtml (the ancient version of the > library), which needs a version upgrade to solve a severity important > bug in gnucash. There is only one ot

selinux-enabled packages (and avr-gdb)

2005-03-14 Thread Markus Schabel
Hello! When using selinux on debian, I need the following packages with selinux-patches applied (on sarge): coreutils, cron, libpam0g, libpam-modules, libpam-runtime, logrotate, ssh, sysvinit IMHO these packages are not officially available on sarge, but libselinux1 and selinux-utils are availabl

Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!

2005-03-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma, 14-03-2005 te 17:59 +0100, schreef Goswin von Brederlow: > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Op vr, 11-03-2005 te 19:14 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek: > >> The queue ordering is entirely automatic, and AIUI the queue(s) is (are) > >> sorted by: > >> > >> - target suite > >

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This really sounds a good step. Just one small question, AFAIK package building of softwares on the other obscure platforms has helped raise a lot of hidden bugs. Will that continue ? Will that continue on scc.debian.org? Regards, Ritesh On Monda

Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!

2005-03-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Op vr, 11-03-2005 te 19:14 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek: >> The queue ordering is entirely automatic, and AIUI the queue(s) is (are) >> sorted by: >> >> - target suite >- previous compilation state (already built packages are prioritized > above

Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!

2005-03-14 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, March 14, 2005 15:09, Goswin von Brederlow said: >>> People >>> should stop repeating the fiction then that "just wait" means "your >>> package will eventually get built". > It usualy is. It might not be. And it can be an awfully long wait. > The last one is the problem. The first two not.

Re: Do not make gratuitous source uploads just to provoke the buildds!

2005-03-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Op za, 12-03-2005 te 15:01 -0800, schreef Thomas Bushnell BSG: >> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Remember that the buildd queue is not FIFO at all. The queue has a >> > completly static order. Any changes to the queue are jus