Re: [Fwd: Re: Care to sponsor grass?]

2005-02-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:29:38PM -0500, Steve Halasz wrote: > My sponsor suggested I write to you and request that you consider the > grass package in the NEW queue for Sarge. It fixes an RC security bug > and a number of other problems. This bug is no longer RC because grass is no longer in tes

[Fwd: Re: Care to sponsor grass?]

2005-02-12 Thread Steve Halasz
Hi, My sponsor suggested I write to you and request that you consider the grass package in the NEW queue for Sarge. It fixes an RC security bug and a number of other problems. Thanks! Steve Forwarded Message > From: Jochen Friedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Steve Halasz <[EMA

Re: which 2.6 kernel will be in sarge?

2005-02-12 Thread Luis M
I have narrow the problems down to i845 (intel graphics chip) and drm bugs in the kernel. note I say the kernel and not X drivers. This is because the same X driver works well with a 2.6.8 kernel and 2.6.9, but it locks sporadically with 2.6.10 and 2.6.11-rc3!! I don't know what the problem is exac

Re: debian-release@lists.debian.org

2005-02-12 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jean-Yves LENHOF ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050212 10:05]: > When looking at linphone package, it seems that the actual package of > linphone in sarge depends on libgnutls10 but the new version, which > isn't propaged to sarge for unknown reason, doesn't need this version. The reason is that linphone

debian-release@lists.debian.org

2005-02-12 Thread Jean-Yves LENHOF
Hi release team, For the 285928 RC bug of libgnutls10... There was some discussion there : http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/01/msg00171.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/01/msg00172.html and the idea was to drop it So I was looking why these package are still there : w