Hi Arnaud,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 10:24:54PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> I've upload a new kaffe release. It's taken from CVS HEAD. It's not
> perfect but it's better then the one in the archive at the moment. I
> don't know if it should go to Sarge because a new package should be
> upload nex
Joey Hess writes:
> This version of python fixes a security hole, but is not getting into
> testing because it has RC bugs and is frozen. The RC bug in question,
> 293338, also affects the version in testing. So I suggest that a RM
> review the changes and let this security fix in.
no, please not.
This version of python fixes a security hole, but is not getting into
testing because it has RC bugs and is frozen. The RC bug in question,
293338, also affects the version in testing. So I suggest that a RM
review the changes and let this security fix in.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Descriptio
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm not aware that reiserfs has *ever* been stable.
Then it's not clear to me if stability is a criteria reiserfs users care
about[1]. Since there are apparently happy reiserfs users, why should we
take their filesystem away from them in the installer? I think we'll
take mo
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:43:49PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> I noticed that phpgroupware 0.9.16.003-1 slipped from sid into sarge
> after 0.9.16.005-1 had closed the RC bugs that kept it out but
> apparently before 0.9.16.005-1 was installed into unstable.
Known race condition
> Is this a
Hi.
I noticed that phpgroupware 0.9.16.003-1 slipped from sid into sarge
after 0.9.16.005-1 had closed the RC bugs that kept it out but
apparently before 0.9.16.005-1 was installed into unstable.
Is this a problem with the testing scripts? If so, does this happen
often enough to be a real proble
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:39:48PM +0100, Jean-Yves LENHOF wrote:
> Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 08:13 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:55:22PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> > The plan is to release d-i RC3 with a 2.6.8 kernel. There are currently
> > no plans for
Le mardi 08 février 2005 à 08:13 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:55:22PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> The plan is to release d-i RC3 with a 2.6.8 kernel. There are currently
> no plans for a further d-i release for sarge after RC3.
>
> This means that at least t
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 03:55:22PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Sorry for this question, but I'm wondering whether we yet know which
> 2.6 kernel will be in sarge. At the moment, two or three of my
> machines have show-stopper problems with the 2.6.8 kernel, but all of
> them work well with the
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:15:04AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> Would another dpkg translation update be accepted into stable? If so,
> I'll merge in these updates from Christian and create a package.
If you mean testing, yes, it would.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
Would another dpkg translation update be accepted into stable? If so,
I'll merge in these updates from Christian and create a package.
Forwarded Message
From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg l10n update
Date: Tue, 8
11 matches
Mail list logo
