On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:40:16AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:22:19 -0500,
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > * namazu2 2.0.14-1 needed, have 2.0.13-4 for DSA-627-1
> > OOD on arm, *13* days old now.
> I'll build namazu2 for arm and ask maintainer to check, sign, and upload.
I
At Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:22:19 -0500,
Joey Hess wrote:
> * namazu2 2.0.14-1 needed, have 2.0.13-4 for DSA-627-1
> OOD on arm, *13* days old now.
I'll build namazu2 for arm and ask maintainer to check, sign, and upload.
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at holes that are fixed in unstable but are still open in testing, from
http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html :
* playmidi 2.4debian-3 needed, have 2.4debian-2 for DSA-641-1
OOD on mipsel, 4 days old now
* koffice 1:1.3.5-1 needed, have 1:1.3.4-1 for CAN-200
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:40:16AM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:22:19 -0500,
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > * namazu2 2.0.14-1 needed, have 2.0.13-4 for DSA-627-1
> > OOD on arm, *13* days old now.
> I'll build namazu2 for arm and ask maintainer to check, sign, and upload.
I
At Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:22:19 -0500,
Joey Hess wrote:
> * namazu2 2.0.14-1 needed, have 2.0.13-4 for DSA-627-1
> OOD on arm, *13* days old now.
I'll build namazu2 for arm and ask maintainer to check, sign, and upload.
Thanks,
--
Kenshi Muto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Looking at holes that are fixed in unstable but are still open in testing, from
http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/testing-security.html :
* playmidi 2.4debian-3 needed, have 2.4debian-2 for DSA-641-1
OOD on mipsel, 4 days old now
* koffice 1:1.3.5-1 needed, have 1:1.3.4-1 for CAN-200
Dhiraj Gaurh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> Sarge does contain kernel packages for amd64 but if you try to
> download sarge, there is no directory for the amd64 architecture. Is
> amd64 not yet fully supported by sarge ?? Do I need to install i386
> and then upgrade the kernel to amd64, the
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:37:11PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> m4 (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> * Added appropriate --build and --host options to ./configure call in
> debian/rules to support cross-compilation. Also, skip "make check"
> after the build if we are cross-compiling. Cl
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:58:57PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Note: The funny thing is that this package is not in hold. It should
> probably be. I guess the testing scripts do not know yet that this
> is a base package because of the change in the source package name.
I've added it to the free
m4 (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added appropriate --build and --host options to ./configure call in
debian/rules to support cross-compilation. Also, skip "make check"
after the build if we are cross-compiling. Closes: #283724.
-- Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 8 Jan 2005
Hi,
Sarge does contain kernel packages for amd64 but if you try to
download sarge, there is no directory for the amd64 architecture. Is
amd64 not yet fully supported by sarge ?? Do I need to install i386 and
then upgrade the kernel to amd64, then what about all the other
applications ?
Thank
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2005-01-18 Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > diffutils (2.8.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
>
> > * Repackaged source without the GFDL-covered manual. Closes: #212523.
> [...]
> > [ The new diff-doc package is in preparation and almost read
Dhiraj Gaurh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> Sarge does contain kernel packages for amd64 but if you try to
> download sarge, there is no directory for the amd64 architecture. Is
> amd64 not yet fully supported by sarge ?? Do I need to install i386
> and then upgrade the kernel to amd64, the
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 12:37:11PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> m4 (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> * Added appropriate --build and --host options to ./configure call in
> debian/rules to support cross-compilation. Also, skip "make check"
> after the build if we are cross-compiling. Cl
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:58:57PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Note: The funny thing is that this package is not in hold. It should
> probably be. I guess the testing scripts do not know yet that this
> is a base package because of the change in the source package name.
I've added it to the free
m4 (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added appropriate --build and --host options to ./configure call in
debian/rules to support cross-compilation. Also, skip "make check"
after the build if we are cross-compiling. Closes: #283724.
-- Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 8 Jan 2005
Hi,
Sarge does contain kernel packages for amd64 but if you try to
download sarge, there is no directory for the amd64 architecture. Is
amd64 not yet fully supported by sarge ?? Do I need to install i386 and
then upgrade the kernel to amd64, then what about all the other
applications ?
Thanks
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2005-01-18 Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > diffutils (2.8.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
>
> > * Repackaged source without the GFDL-covered manual. Closes: #212523.
> [...]
> > [ The new diff-doc package is in preparation and almost read
On 2005-01-18 Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diffutils (2.8.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
> * Repackaged source without the GFDL-covered manual. Closes: #212523.
[...]
> [ The new diff-doc package is in preparation and almost ready, there
> is a preliminary version in my home page at
On 2005-01-18 Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diffutils (2.8.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
> * Repackaged source without the GFDL-covered manual. Closes: #212523.
[...]
> [ The new diff-doc package is in preparation and almost ready, there
> is a preliminary version in my home page at
20 matches
Mail list logo
