Re: Dropping 2.4 hppa kernel-image packages

2005-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:37:10PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > I've been discussing lately on #d-kernel about the fate of 2.4 hppa kernel > packages. Here is a brief summary of the issue: > I received a bugreport (#289590) because 2.4.27 package FTBFS, and that's > the result of: > 1) a (imho)

Re: Dropping 2.4 hppa kernel-image packages

2005-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:37:10PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > I've been discussing lately on #d-kernel about the fate of 2.4 hppa kernel > packages. Here is a brief summary of the issue: > I received a bugreport (#289590) because 2.4.27 package FTBFS, and that's > the result of: > 1) a (imho)

Dropping 2.4 hppa kernel-image packages

2005-01-12 Thread Thibaut VARENE
Hi, I've been discussing lately on #d-kernel about the fate of 2.4 hppa kernel packages. Here is a brief summary of the issue: I received a bugreport (#289590) because 2.4.27 package FTBFS, and that's the result of: 1) a (imho) very invasive and massive Debian patchset that conflicts with 2) a hu

Dropping 2.4 hppa kernel-image packages

2005-01-12 Thread Thibaut VARENE
Hi, I've been discussing lately on #d-kernel about the fate of 2.4 hppa kernel packages. Here is a brief summary of the issue: I received a bugreport (#289590) because 2.4.27 package FTBFS, and that's the result of: 1) a (imho) very invasive and massive Debian patchset that conflicts with 2) a hu

Bug#290018: charva FTBFS (was: Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing)

2005-01-12 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: charva Severity: critical Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:52:20 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyway, I've just try to build it on x86 and it FTBFS :( > > Is this still the case? Is this related to the bugs in kaffe on i386? I

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:11:40AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:20:37 -0800, > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, > >> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Bug#290018: charva FTBFS (was: Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing)

2005-01-12 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: charva Severity: critical Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:52:20 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyway, I've just try to build it on x86 and it FTBFS :( > > Is this still the case? Is this related to the bugs in kaffe on i386? I

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:11:40AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:20:37 -0800, > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > >> Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, > >> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w