Steve Langasek wrote:
The testing scripts only check the installability of arch: all packages on
one of our architectures -- for obvious reasons, that architecture is i386.
It's more the other way around: the testing scripts would check the
installability of arch: all packages on all architect
On 3-Jan-2005, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I think Steve's idea of using an Octave API counter may be better.
|
| John: Would it be possible to replace
|
|/usr/lib/octave/$VERSION/
|
| with
|
|/usr/lib/octave/$APICOUNTER/
|
| in the hope th
Op za, 08-01-2005 te 03:14 -0800, schreef Steve Langasek:
> Already on it. The hint failed yesterday for some reason; I'm trying a
> different hint today that stands a better chance of working, and if not it
> should at least give us a better idea of why things aren't ready.
>
Thanks Steve, let
On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 02:44 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > To alleviate this problem, I request that alsa-modules-2.4.27-1* be
> > removed from sarge.
>
> Is this an issue with the current version of alsa-modules-2.4.27-1 being
> broken wrt the original 2.4.27-1 ABI, or is it just an issue of t
Hello,
this is an report of an woody to sarge upgrade. To give a short summary first:
Summary:
---
Given the complex and non-standard setup for the upgrade, the upgrade was more
than impressive. There was one glitch, with unmet dependencies. Although it
is most likely caused by a backp
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:41:50AM +0100, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> Hamlib3 (unstable) needs hinting to go into testing. There are a bunch
> of packages which depend on hamlib3 which can go in at the same time:
> xlog, tlf, gpredict and grig.
Already on it. The hint failed yesterday for some reaso
Hamlib3 (unstable) needs hinting to go into testing. There are a bunch
of packages which depend on hamlib3 which can go in at the same time:
xlog, tlf, gpredict and grig.
Thanks,
Joop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
P.S. I am not subscribed to the list, please cc to me.
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 02:44:10AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:41:08AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > You may know all of this already but in case you don't ...
> > Because of bug #284356 and the fact that kernel-image-2.4.27-1 packages
> > affected by this bug were al
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:41:08AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> You may know all of this already but in case you don't ...
> Because of bug #284356 and the fact that kernel-image-2.4.27-1 packages
> affected by this bug were allowed into sarge, users of sarge and kernel
> 2.4.27-1 can't load module
Hi,
There's still some kind of hint on pcmcia-cs which makes it migrate to
testing way too fast:
$ grep-excuses pcmcia-cs
pcmcia-cs (3.2.5-8 to 3.2.5-9)
Maintainer: Per Olofsson
Too young, only 0 of 10 days old
Should ignore, but considering anyway
Valid candidate
Please remove t
10 matches
Mail list logo
