Re: GNUstep packages

2005-01-05 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built on arm) gnustep-ant

Re: GNUstep packages

2005-01-05 Thread Eric Heintzmann
On 2005-01-05 19:00:24 +0100 Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: Hi, Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candi

Re: GNUstep packages

2005-01-05 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. > (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) > > One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built > on arm) There is 1 o

Re: GNUstep packages

2005-01-05 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. > (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) > > One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built > on arm) gnustep-antlr/arm is in inc

GNUstep packages

2005-01-05 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Hi, Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge. (soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed) One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built on arm) But all the 53 others GNUstep packages are valid candidates and cannot enter in sarge.

Please Consider atari-bootstrap for sarge

2005-01-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Please consider approving atari-bootstrap for sarge. atari-bootstrap_3.3-5 has been in the archive 19 days and closes all outstanding bugs on the package. It is currently used on the m68k daily d-i builds and I've had no reports of problems. The most important change is that it supports several

testing security status report

2005-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Here I am again with the weekly report on packages that have security fixes in sid that arn't in sarge yet. I've made a web page that has essentially the same info, if you ignore the open bugs also listed there. Not sure if it will make sense for me to keep up the reports or not given this page. ht

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-05 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > About all the other java packages, I'd like to move a lot of them in > main but even if kaffe (and sablevm) made good steps, they are not > stable (kaffe)/complete (both) enough to move them to main at the > moment. I don't think the

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:20:37 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, >> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > * charva (- to 1.0.1-3) >> > + Maintainer: De

Re: freeswan and opensc migration to testing

2005-01-05 Thread Andreas Barth
* Domenico Andreoli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050105 11:05]: > looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to > enter sarge together. Hint added. Thanks. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:30:35 -0800, mbc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working on a new version of this package now. It depends on > java2-runtime because it uses swing. Is there a different virtual > dependency that I can use to resolve the problem and get it into > testing? If you have never see

Re: freeswan and opensc migration to testing

2005-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Domenico, On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:18:54AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to > enter sarge together. Well spotted. Hint added. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signatu

freeswan and opensc migration to testing

2005-01-05 Thread Domenico Andreoli
hi dear Release Managers, looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to enter sarge together. thank you all for your continuous involvement in the debian project :) happy new year! cheers domenico -[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, > Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * charva (- to 1.0.1-3) > > + Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers > > + Section: contrib/libs > > + 342 days

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

2005-01-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * charva (- to 1.0.1-3) > + Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers > + Section: contrib/libs > + 342 days old (needed 10 days) >