Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:39:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> Looking at the other page that does something similar (based on ftp.d.o
>> bugs) that someone on this list should know the url for, and merging the
>> two would be good too.
>
>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 01:39:57PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Looking at the other page that does something similar (based on ftp.d.o
> bugs) that someone on this list should know the url for, and merging the
> two would be good too.
You are referring to:
http://ftp-master.wolffelaar.nl/remo
Anthony Towns wrote:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/rene-full.txt
Oh, I should note: those are automated suggestions; they're not all
correct, and the action they might require for resolution isn't
necessarily straightforward or obvious. Don't go filing bugs or
otherwise pestering anyone b
Santiago Vila wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, Björn Stenberg wrote:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/obsolete.html
I see that the gambas package is in your list, why do you want to remove it?
I think it would be better not to draw conclusions ("ftpmaster needs").
Drawing conclusions isn't so bad, but
Santiago Vila wrote:
> I see that the gambas package is in your list, why do you want to remove it?
I don't want to remove gambas. The word 'it' refers to the obsolete binary.
Until rene is run, britney will think gambas needs gambas-gb-qt-kde and
gambas-gb-qt-kde-html built and will not let it
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:32AM +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> in the case of gambas, and AIUI, whether they get removed or not is
> not relevant for it migrating to testing (since there is no gambas in
> testing). but most of times, having old packages lying around
> effectively prevents
* Santiago Vila [Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:28:58 +0100]:
> I see that the gambas package is in your list, why do you want to remove it?
> I think it would be better not to draw conclusions ("ftpmaster needs").
> Being empty does not always mean the package should be removed,
> it may be a convenience
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Prompted by a bug report from Kurt Roeckx and a patch from Christian
> Hammers, my testing script now includes a check for obsolete
> binaries.
>
> In addition to showing obsolete binaries for each package, there's a
> collection page showing all obsole
Hi.
Prompted by a bug report from Kurt Roeckx and a patch from Christian Hammers,
my testing script now includes a check for obsolete binaries.
In addition to showing obsolete binaries for each package, there's a collection
page showing all obsolete binaries found:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debia
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 11:46:31PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Someone who installs from 3.0r[012] should have "stable" in sources.list.
> There is no need to have packages available in both places, at least
> not several weeks after the release of 3.0r3.
Assuming they've got a network source i
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 01:21:23PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> (CC'ing d-release as this is more a release issue than an installer issue)
>
> On Saturday 18 December 2004 12:51, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Dec 18, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROT
* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041219 00:35]:
> [...]
Thanks, taken with one change:
> Another minor change of the toolchain for ia64 is pending. Gcc-3.4
> started to use libunwind, but the the internal gcc version was
> buggy. Therefore the libunwind shared library had to be built from t
12 matches
Mail list logo
