Re: Bug#284962: fig2sty does not cope with xfig-3.2.5-alpha5 file format

package fig2sty severity 284962 normal stop [Cc: to debian-release, just in case the "grave" severity level has already triggered actions from the release managers.] > Version: 1:0.1-4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > I experienced the problem wrinting my own x

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 04:20:12PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Some NMUing has been done lately on some of the older security holes in > sarge. Here are the ones the testing security team is currently tracking > that are fixed in unstable but don't yet have a fix in sarge, plus a few > others of inte

Re: file in sarge (was Re: [VAC] ...)

tags 283316 -sarge tags 283316 +woody thanks Hi Michael, On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: > Am Mi, den 25.08.2004 schrieb Steve Langasek um 11:05: > > It still seems like a rather large diff for such a small number of known > > bugfixes... Colin? > I just had a th

Re: proposal for the KDE 3.3 transition

* Steve Langasek [Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:39:26 -0800]: > > (1) which are: kdeaccessibility kdeaddons kdeadmin kdeartwork > > kdebase kdebindings kdeedu kdegames kdegraphics kde-i18n > > kdemultimedia kdenetwork kdepim kdesdk kdetoys kdeutils kdewebdev. > I trust that this list of p

Re: Please don't remove gcc-3.2 before release of sarge

* Matthias Klose ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040731 11:25]: > Andreas Barth writes: > > currently, three package still build-dep on gcc-3.2: libxml2, > > systemimager and xen. However, 520 packages depend on one of the > > libxml2-binary packages, including kde and gnome. So, I would consider > > it a bad

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041211 08:55]: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:03:48AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041210 08:30]: > > > Joey Hess wrote: > > > > perl 5.8.4-4 needed, have 5.8.4-3 for CAN-2004-0976 > > > > Still missing mipsel buil

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:03:48AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041210 08:30]: > > Joey Hess wrote: > > > perl 5.8.4-4 needed, have 5.8.4-3 for CAN-2004-0976 > > > Still missing mipsel build, should probably be re-queued or > > > uploaded manually. > > I

Re: proposal for the KDE 3.3 transition

On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 06:02:05PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > the purpose of this mail is to explain to the Release Team the > (straightforward) proposal that the KDE Team has come up with to > ensure a safe transition of KDE 3.3 to sarge. > in a nutshell, the intention is the same as t