Re: Where should I request forgotten rebuilds?

2004-12-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:01:17PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >Where would I request that? On the respective porters list? Somewhere else? > > To contact a buildd administrator, send mail to > @buildd.debian.org . (Where is the app

Re: Where should I request forgotten rebuilds?

2004-12-04 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Where would I request that? On the respective porters list? Somewhere else? To contact a buildd administrator, send mail to @buildd.debian.org . (Where is the appropriate architecture.) -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTE

Where should I request forgotten rebuilds?

2004-12-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Release team, Thanks for the octave cluebat. Thanks also for pushing R through last weekend or whenever that was. There is one remaining problem: r-cran-fseries is 50 days old and not in testing because initial builds on arm and s390 failed due to changes happening then to the R toolchain. These

Re: scim and associated need a hint

2004-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:45:22PM -0800, trochee wrote: > I believe that SCIM and its dependent packages scim-hangul, scim-m17n, > scim-uim, scim-chinese and scim-tables are stuck in a mutual-blocking > loop: > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?waiting=scim shows: >1. scim-hangul is wa

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 09:37:32PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andre

scim and associated need a hint

2004-12-04 Thread trochee
Dear Debian release managers: I believe that SCIM and its dependent packages scim-hangul, scim-m17n, scim-uim, scim-chinese and scim-tables are stuck in a mutual-blocking loop: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?waiting=scim shows: 1. scim-hangul is waiting for scim 2. scim-m17n is wa

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Björn Stenberg
Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > I would not complain about this if we were able to clearly see such > problems ahead during the ten day period. But experience has shown that > we routinely fail to recognize them from the output of Björn's scripts. > > The reason of this, one could conject, is that th

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 09:37:32PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andre

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 06:1

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 05:41:16AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 06:53:30AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 06:53:30AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PR

Re: wmaker, wsound* and libdockapp.

2004-12-04 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Andreas Metzler wrote: [snip] > However wsoundprefs depends on wsoundserver (which contains > libwsound.so.1) and the maintainer of wsoundserver chose to not only > switch to librwaster3 in 0.4.0-18 (or -19). Instead he uploaded a new > version of libdockapp (bumped soname libdockapp2) at the sam

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 06:15]: > > > > I think Richard is basically correct in h

Please review openssh/1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4

2004-12-04 Thread Colin Watson
openssh (1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4) unstable; urgency=high * Fix timing information leak allowing discovery of invalid usernames in PAM keyboard-interactive authentication (backported from a patch by Darren Tucker; closes: #281595). * Make sure that there's a delay in PAM keyboard-interactiv

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

2004-12-04 Thread Andreas Barth
* Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 22:45]: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041203 06:15]: > > > I think Richard is basically correct in his analysis. Bjorn's page lists > > > > > > octave2.1 > > > octave

Re: Please hint shadow for entering testing

2004-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:20:26AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > The shadow package got its 4th "translation only" NMU upload in a few > months. > It's now built on all arches. > The changelog: > shadow (1:4.0.3-30.4) unstable; urgency=low > * Non-maintainer upload targeted at sarge. >

Re: Accepted newt 0.51.6-19 (i386 source)

2004-12-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:09:40PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Please push newt to sarge ASAP. > This release fixes one RC bug, which was a mixup between > Traditional and Chinese translations, and four new translations. * Fix regression: Tradition Chinese translations that were over-wr