Re: possible update for bsdmainutils

2004-11-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:17:53PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:09:00PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:34:29PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > > > Can this change be pushed to testing if I upload the package to > > > unstable? > > > > Yes.

Re: possible update for bsdmainutils

2004-11-01 Thread Graham Wilson
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 03:09:00PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:34:29PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > > There is an outstanding bug (#254075) for bsdmainutils, which describes > > a case where calendar(1) claims a file contains an invalid multibyte > > sequence, even

Re: kernel and upgrades from woody to sarge

2004-11-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:00:00PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041101 21:45]: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 08:44:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > during my investigation for the next release update, it seems that there > > > are more upgrade issues rela

Re: kernel and upgrades from woody to sarge

2004-11-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041101 21:45]: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 08:44:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > during my investigation for the next release update, it seems that there > > are more upgrade issues related to the kernel than I had tought. With > > the great help from a l

Re: kernel and upgrades from woody to sarge

2004-11-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 08:44:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > during my investigation for the next release update, it seems that there > are more upgrade issues related to the kernel than I had tought. With > the great help from a lot of people I compiled that list: > + real i386 - already han

xerces not-for-us problem persists but no longer release issue

2004-11-01 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Graham Wilson (also in debian-xml-sgml-devel) has kindly uploaded a powerpc binary of xerces24 thus allowing it to presumably transition to testing today. The long-standing situation of xerces23 and xerces24 being bogusly in not-for-us for some platforms still remains: http://people.debian.org/~

Re: Request for m4 to enter testing

2004-11-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 12:58:49PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > m4 1.4.2-1 has been in unstable for 20 days now. > I think it should be safe to have it in testing as well. Approved. Sorry for the delay. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: possible update for bsdmainutils

2004-11-01 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 01:34:29PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote: > There is an outstanding bug (#254075) for bsdmainutils, which describes > a case where calendar(1) claims a file contains an invalid multibyte > sequence, even when it doesn't, on alpha (and maybe other platforms > where sizeof(int) !